ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than they had in their previous campaigns, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2545|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG蓝皮SC-98-------有点争议!!!~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-1-17 13:40:26 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Although Napoleon's army entered Russia with far more supplies than they had in their previous campaigns, it had provisions for only twenty-four days.

A. they had in their previous campaigns,
B. their previous campaigns had had,
C. they had for any previous campaign,
D. in their previous campaigns,
E. for any previous campaign,


正确答案---E,我选择了C,OG说这里they,their都不能指代army因为是单数,但我觉得这种集体词就如country一样,我也可以指军中的每一位士兵,用they也说的过去啊?然后E选项只接了介词,主谓都省了,但前面的比较里是they entered Russia,那这里不就是他们这次entered Russia带的补给比原来entered Russia打仗带的补给都要多,这样不就是有歧义了吗?好乱哦~ 哪位NN能帮我解惑一下,感激,感激!!!!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-1-17 13:57:34 | 只看该作者
it had provisions for only twenty-four days.

Here, what does "it" refer to??
板凳
发表于 2011-1-17 14:00:08 | 只看该作者
"it" is not campaigns, not supplies, not Russia. "it" could only be __________.
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-1-26 04:30:35 | 只看该作者
"it" is not campaigns, not supplies, not Russia. "it" could only be __________.
-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/1/17 14:00:08)

Got it!!!!! It could only refer to the Great "army", so A.B.C.D must be wrong!!! Really appreciate your help!!!!!!~
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-1-26 04:38:12 | 只看该作者
One more question, please~  Does the abbreviation of the "SV" in the choice E cause any ambiguity, I mean, just as what I mentioned in the #.1 floor. I'll look forward your answer, thank you very much!~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-2 06:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部