大家帮忙找一下逻辑漏洞吧 谢谢谢

Studies （如果没有话说的话，可以随便攻击一下这个study，缺乏背景信息）have found that employees of not-for-profit organizations and charities are often more highly motivated than employees of for-profit corporations to perform well at work when their performance is not being monitored or evaluated. Interviews with employees
            （同study，可以挑毛病。interviewee的挑选？问的问题是否引导interviewee向某个方向作出回答。）of not-for-profit organizations suggest that the reason for their greater motivation is the belief that their work helps to improve society（for-profit的员工一样也可以认为他们的工作可以帮助到社会，作者没有指出for-profit的人是怎么样想的。）Because they believe in the importance of their work, they have personal reasons to perform well, even when no financial reward is present（攻击作者的这个因果。说belief只是一个方面。可能因为对工作的更感兴趣?可能因为工作比较容易做?即使没有financial reward,non-for-profit可能有来自政府或者charity的资金支持。所以他们不需要考虑经济上的压力.） Thus, if our corporation
            （让个小步，就算前面作者说得都对。nonprofit适用的东西不一定对for profit管用。员工会认为无缘无故把profit分出去，影响他们的bonus，可能更加没有积极性。）began donating a significant portion of its profits to humanitarian causes, our employees’ motivation and productivity would increase substantially and our overall profits would increase as well（significant donation短期内反而会导致profit下降。另外，肯定还有其他因素影响员工工作的积极性。而且，如果说是因为汽车行业这两年市场不景气的话，那么公司首当其冲应该想办法度过难关，而不是捐钱。）

不知道说的对不对。希望能启发思路啦。