ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1301|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求教一道LR,thx

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-10-21 02:54:00 | 只看该作者

求教一道LR,thx

This summer,Jennifer,who has worked at KVZ Manufacturing for just over three years,plans to spend with her family the entire four weeks of paid vacation to which she is entitled this year. Anyone one who has worked at KVZ Manufactureing for betrween one and four years is automatically entitled to exactly three weeks paid vacation each year but can apply up to half of any vacation time that remains unused at the end of one year to the next year's vacation.

If the statements above are all true,which one of the following must also be true on the basis of them?

A)Jennifier did not use two weeks of the paid vaction time to which she was entitled last year.

B)If Jennifer continues to work for KVZ Manufacuring, she will only be entitled to three weeks paid vaction next year.

D)Last year Jennifer took only one week of the paid vacation time to which she was entitled.

A is correct.

why A? I think for A to be correct,it should add" at least" two weeks.Because there is "up to half" in the stimulus.

沙发
发表于 2008-11-2 18:31:00 | 只看该作者
恩。。。我觉得at least可加可不加,因为除了2周没用,还有就是3周都没有用。那就是可以换取1.5周的假期,但我想,这个0.5周可能不count。
板凳
发表于 2008-11-21 16:33:00 | 只看该作者
看看都怎么解释的
地板
发表于 2008-11-21 16:47:00 | 只看该作者

题目本身说她得到的这四周【3周应有的+1周(以前剩下的一半)】中,并没表示她已经把原来积累的假期全部用完了啊。这个at least不加一样不表示她没用完的假期只有2周啊。。。和up to half 结合起来看看。at least还是不用加吧,加了的话更科学一些。但是不加的话在逻辑上一样的没有问题

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 10:17
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部