ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Concerned about the financial well-being of its elderly citizens, the government of Runagia decided two years ago to increase by 20 percent the government-provided pension paid to all Runagians over 65. Inflation in the intervening period has been negligible, and the increase has been duly received by all eligible Runagians. Nevertheless, many of them are no better off financially than they were before the increase, in large part because __________.

正确答案: E

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1666|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-8-Q19: GWD-2-12, 没搜索到,请教!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-9-29 16:35:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-8-Q19: GWD-2-12, 没搜索到,请教!

GWD-8-Q19: GWD-2-12

Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

 

Concerned about financial well-being of its elderly citizens, the government of Runagia decided two years ago to increase by 20 percent the government-provided pension paid to all Runagians over 65.  Inflation in the intervening period has been negligible, and the increase has been duly received by all eligible Runagians.  Nevertheless, many of them are no better off financially than they were before the increase, in large part because ________.

 

A.        They rely entirely on the government pension for their income

B.        Runagian banks are so inefficient that it can take up to three weeks to cash a pension check

C.        They buy goods whose prices tend to rise especially fast in times of inflation

D.       The pension was increased when the number of elderly Runagians below the poverty level reached an all-time high

E.        In Runagia children typically supplement the income of elderly parents, but only by enough to provide them with a comfortable living

答案:E, 说实在的,我没看到懂...-_-请指教!!

沙发
发表于 2008-10-11 03:42:00 | 只看该作者
原文说,虽然政府给每个老人的养老金增加了20%,很多的生活并没有更好。

E的解释是:小孩们会照顾父母,但是,仅仅给他们足够生活的钱。意思是,政府增加了。小孩就减少支持。最终老人的钱没有变。就是没有更好了。(在现实中,总体的debate常有人提到,某某政策的好处,都因为这样的原因,并没有得以实现。就是这个例子)

而D,这部分人的增加,没有改变很多人的到更多养老金的事实,不能反驳那些人生活可以改善的这个推论。所以不能支持原文。
板凳
发表于 2008-10-11 03:45:00 | 只看该作者
再补充一点。

D是对部分样本的影响,并不能直接推出整体的后果,E是对全部样本有效的影响,必然导致结果。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-5 07:43
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部