ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Many house builders offer rent-to-buy programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing and to apply part of the rent to a purchase later.

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1672|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG11-49

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-7-21 21:26:00 | 只看该作者

OG11-49

49.   Many house builders offer rent-to-buy programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing and to apply part of the rent to a purchase later.

(A) programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing and to apply

(B) programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing and to apply

(C) programs; that enables a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing, to apply

(D) programs, which enables a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing, applying

(E) programs, which enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to be able to move into new housing, applying

Rhetorical construction

In a lengthy sentence consisting of many phrases, it is essential to determine which phrases and words are necessary to the sentence and which words may be eliminated because they are unnecessary. The relative pronoun that correctly refers to programs and introduces the subordinate clause; family is followed by two phrases that are clear and correct. To be able to move, however, is needlessly wordy, repeating the meaning of enable, and can be reduced to to move. This creates a parallel construction in which programs ... enable a family ... to move ... and to apply.

A     To be able to move is wordy; to apply is not logically parallel to the infinitive phrase (able) to move

B      Correct. In this sentence, eliminating the wordy construction to be able allows to move to be parallel to to apply.

C     Using a semicolon here causes that to refer too broadly o the entire previous clause rather than specifically to programs, the two infinitives should be joined by the conjunction and, not separated by a comma

D     The restrictive clause following programs defines programs and must be followed by that; which incorrectly introduces a nonrestrictive clause, set off in a pair of commas, containing relevant but not critical information; enables does not agree with the plural subject

E      That introduces a restrictive clause that defines programs; which introduces a nonrestrictive clause, set off by a pair of commas, that may be dropped from the sentence; that is required here because the clause defines programs

The correct answer is B.

A项两个不定式不平行的原因是否在于一个是(enable) to apply,另一个是(be able) to move呢??拜请大侠不吝赐教~~~

沙发
发表于 2008-7-21 21:28:00 | 只看该作者
enable和be able to是一个意思,用一个就可以了
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-7-21 21:29:00 | 只看该作者
还有,to apply前的to为什么不能省略??多谢~~~
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-7-21 21:31:00 | 只看该作者
LSS,嗯,这两个词语意重复我知道,只是不确定结构看上去相同的to apply和to move被定性为逻辑上不平行~
5#
发表于 2008-7-21 21:37:00 | 只看该作者
enable....to do and to do
6#
发表于 2008-7-21 21:39:00 | 只看该作者
to move和to apply对应,不是和be able to move对应,动词都是enbale
7#
发表于 2008-9-13 20:19:00 | 只看该作者

如果去掉apply 前的 to, 则apply会引起歧义,造成apply和enable平行。

这在逻辑上是错的。所以应该加上to。

8#
发表于 2008-9-29 08:23:00 | 只看该作者
same question
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 17:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部