ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2288|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

补充250、194就是做不对!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-1-22 18:33:00 | 只看该作者

补充250、194就是做不对!

194.    Discrimination in wages paid in occupations that are predominantly male over the predominantly female have given rise to substantial differentials between the wage of housepainters and secretaries and between the wages of parking-lot attendants and library assistants.
(A) paid in occupations that are predominantly male over the predominantly female have
(B) paid in occupations that are predominantly make over those that are predominantly female have
(C) that favors predominantly male occupations over the predominantly female have
(D) that favors predominantly male occupations over those that are predominantly female has
(E) paid in predominantly male occupations over the predominantly female has
答案是E,为什么不是D
沙发
发表于 2004-1-22 19:39:00 | 只看该作者
d是不对的。有两点, 请大家一起看看吧

1、按照D的话,就wages that favors,这里有一点逻辑错误,paid修饰wage才是合理
2、D 中over those that are predominantly female,变成female are occupations, 不对了。E中省略了predominantly female(occupation)
板凳
发表于 2004-1-25 00:03:00 | 只看该作者
俺觉着楼上的解释有点牵强, 其实有个很明显的错误不选D

wageS...... favorS  所以D肯定不行
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-14 19:27
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部