ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2642|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

时间副词的位置导致歧义的问题,紫皮37

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-10-4 19:11:00 | 只看该作者

时间副词的位置导致歧义的问题,紫皮37

原题

some buildings that were destroyed and heavily damaged in the earthquake last year were constructed in violation of the city's building code.

正确

some buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earthquake last year had been constructed in violation of the city's building code.

另外一个选项

Last year some of the buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earthquake had been constructed in violation of the city's building code.

为什么去年放句首就变成修饰construction了。所以要想用去年修饰earthquake就只能放在正确选项的位置吗,放在句中就没有歧义吗。时间副词到底应该怎么放在句子里呢?

沙发
发表于 2008-10-4 22:16:00 | 只看该作者
这两个句子意思不一样。正确的句子意思是说这些建筑物被地震损坏发生在去年,另外一个选项是说这些建筑物的建造是发生在去年。我个人感觉last year 也可以放在in the earthquake 之前吧,即some buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged last year in the earthquake had been constructed in violation of the city's building code.具体放在哪儿要看句子意思
[此贴子已经被作者于2008-10-4 22:16:23编辑过]
板凳
发表于 2008-10-5 03:56:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用Xclann在2008-10-4 19:11:00的发言:

原题

some buildings that were destroyed and heavily damaged in the earthquake last year were constructed in violation of the city's building code.

正确

some buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earthquake last year had been constructed in violation of the city's building code.

另外一个选项

Last year some of the buildings that were destroyed or heavily damaged in the earthquake had been constructed in violation of the city's building code.

为什么去年放句首就变成修饰construction了。所以要想用去年修饰earthquake就只能放在正确选项的位置吗,放在句中就没有歧义吗。时间副词到底应该怎么放在句子里呢?

请看下面一句话:Last year some of the buildings had been constructed.  这句话使用过去完成时态,而标志时间的last year一定是要求一般过去时。

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-10-6 10:27:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢楼上两位,明白了

5#
发表于 2015-11-1 20:37:36 | 只看该作者
原句的意思是earthquake发生在last year ,而且从逻辑上看也是hi先建了之后再被毁。而E选项通过分析,其实Last year修饰的是主句had been constructed,改变了原意。
其实从语法上看,B E都是正确的,但是也要从句子意思上理解,因此选B了。
看到一篇文章分析这题,有点长,也贴上来吧。这是作者参加完GMAC  Summit后写的
Sentence Correction is more and more about meaning rather than grammar
Answer choices B and E are both grammatically correct, but only one maintains the original meaning of the question stem.
According to the original sentence, the earthquake occurred last year. Do both answer choices B and E maintain that meaning? Nope. Only B does. E says that the buildings had been constructed last year. How do we know that?
<Last year> some <of the buildings> <that were destroyed or heavily damaged> <in the earthquake> had been constructed
Last year has to modify some kind of an action or event. The subject some isn’t an event or action, so last year can’t modify that. The next core part of the sentence is had been constructed, which is an action, so last year modifies that action. Note that, in the original sentence, the modifier last year appears as part of the prepositional phrase in the earthquake last year “ that is, in the original sentence, last year is part of the nested modifiers for the subject, while in answer E, last year has been sort of pulled up to the level of the core sentence. And, voila, the meaning has been changed.
https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/blog/2011/09/19/idioms-myths-and-more-news-from-the-gmac/
所以理解句意真的很重要

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-13 13:57
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部