ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1995|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 10-251 的疑问

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-8-15 15:52:00 | 只看该作者

OG 10-251 的疑问

The gyrfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970’s.
(A) extinction; its numbers are now five times greater than
(B) extinction; its numbers are now five times more than
(C) extinction, their numbers now fivefold what they were
(D) extinction, now with fivefold the numbers they had
(E) extinction, now with numbers five times greater than
the key:A。
比较考点:比较对象。now——when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970's

问题在E,og的解释是Choices D and E wrongly use a phrase introduced by now with to modify The gyrfalcon.

在这一句话里我不是很明白,本来就是the gyrfalcon with the numbers,数量是gyrfalcon的数量,为什么错了?(也就是说now with引导的部分修饰主语the gyrfalcon错在哪里)

沙发
发表于 2008-8-15 16:13:00 | 只看该作者
我看不懂,为什么是numbers,不是number?
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-15 16:18:00 | 只看该作者
根据原意来讲,因为是数量,不是数,所以可数应该用numbers
地板
发表于 2008-8-16 00:34:00 | 只看该作者
不明白,帮顶
5#
发表于 2008-8-16 01:25:00 | 只看该作者
我觉得楼主的问题可能应该在于句子中间用了一个分号, 所以必须接一个完整句子 而不是一个PHRASE
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-16 07:00:00 | 只看该作者

嗷...我没表达清楚。先把E代入原句:

The gyrfalcon, an Arctic bird of prey, has survived a close brush with extinction, now with numbers five times greater than when the use of DDT was sharply restricted in the early 1970’s.

对于上面这个句子,OG的解释是:Choices  E wrongly use a phrase introduced by now with to modify The gyrfalcon.

就看上面这个句子,用with numbers来修饰gyrfalcon错在哪里呢?逻辑上不通吗?

gyrfalcon with numbers five times greater than,这个我总觉得是可以这么表达的...

另外~感谢iamwuyan和nemo11~~~

7#
发表于 2008-8-16 07:19:00 | 只看该作者
umm...如果E中的"with numbers ..."在修gyrfalcon, 好像在說gyrfalcon正在有一堆數大過之前?
想問一下, 怎樣unambiguously判斷with是在主語, object, 還是全句?
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-16 08:13:00 | 只看该作者

with应该是修饰歧义了,可能修饰gyrfalcon也可能修饰extiction.

至于gyrfalcon with numbers...我认为gyrfalcon with numbers这三个词组成的一个fragment能够逻辑上成立语法上成立就说明了with可以修饰gyrfalcon了,以前对于指代的题目我都是这样子判断的,虽然放到句子里面是不行的。(不知道这个判断方法对不对)

--------dividing line----------

看了紫本OG11的解释让我恍然大悟了,它对OG10的解释进行了大修改。

with短语隔一个逗号前面如果是个名词,也是需要在前面修饰的名词逻辑上不能被修饰才能跳过去当作独立主格,修饰动词或者说subject的。

而这里E的歧义在于,with结构可能会去修饰extinction.

关于OG10里面的说什么可能会跟with extinction并列,个人感觉有点扯蛋,并列是一定要有名词的!

另外可以看一下下面这个题目,with前面是名词,但是还是跳跃修饰动词,with结构做状语的例子:

OG 11-78 Visitors to the park have often looked up into the leafy canopy and saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs hang like socks on a clothesline.

(A) saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs hang

(B) saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs were hanging

(C) saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, with arms and legs hanging

(D) seen monkeys sleeping on the branches, with arms and legs hanging(D)

(E) seen monkeys sleeping on the branches, whose arms and legs have hung

这个题里,branch是没有arms和legs的,所以一定是跳跃修饰sleeping或者说monkeys的。

----------------

这道题目花了我两个多小时...没法活了

9#
发表于 2008-8-16 08:44:00 | 只看该作者
aeoluseros意思是说with,有可能修饰临近名词,也有可能修饰主语。但是 og-251  修饰extinction不通阿,只能修饰主语阿,这样就不会有歧义了啊就像OG 11-78,就近修饰不通就得跳跃修饰了,感觉不到问题
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-8-16 08:51:00 | 只看该作者
extinction with numbers 这一小部分是说得通的:以某个数量灭绝...(虽然说有数量了就不算灭绝,但是谁知道后面的那个numbers是不是0呢?),只要这一小部分说得通就行了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-8-10 07:11
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部