OG 194

leehom · 发表于 2003-11-21 19:04:00

Presenters at the seminar, one who is blind, will demonstrate adaptive equipment that allows visually impaired people to use computers.
D. one of whom
我对答案D没有意见。但我想起以前的一句话好像是apples, one of which...， ETS认为是 Awkward，请问sth, one of which/whom这样的句型有吗？
另外，如果句子是..at the seminar, many of them blind,...,many of them blind可以算是同位语吗？

lixiaoyang · 发表于 2003-11-21 19:35:00

one of whom不是一个固定句型,而是修饰presenters.
不是同位语

leehom · 发表于 2003-11-21 23:03:00

那我想问many of them是同位语吗？

lixiaoyang · 发表于 2003-11-22 20:15:00

iinobscurity · 发表于 2003-11-23 00:03:00

I think you are a little confused with apposition and relative clause.

In this sentence, even you replace one of whom is blind with ALL OF WHOM ARE BLIND,
It still is a relative clause to modify "Presenters at the seminar"
And Which/ whom are called relative pronouns

smartj · 发表于 2003-11-23 00:48:00

什么是“同位语”？E文怎么说？same position word?

心晴 · 发表于 2004-6-11 08:02:00

以下是引用smartj在2003-11-23 0:48:00的发言：
什么是“同位语”？E文怎么说？same position word?

appositive：n.同位语,adj.同位格的。

我想知道的是，这个题是不是换成one of them也可以？

tianwan · 发表于 2004-6-11 08:42:00

As a matter of fact, I personally feel that ETS does not care about the term he uses. The "one of whom"is obviously accuming the task of a subject in a relative clause. The most conspicuous difference between a relative clause and a appositive clause is that the relative pronoun plays no role in the subclause in the appositive clause whiel the relative pronoun is the subject or object etc. in the relative clause.

I deem the reason ETS call the clause beginning "one of whom" is that the role of the clause played by a nonrestricve clause is the same as that of the clause played by a appositive clause, that is, discribing or expaining the meaning of the antecedent.

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-11 8:59:24编辑过]

winnie · 发表于 2005-1-19 13:12:00

og 194.解释：the subject, presenters, must be followed by a limiting appositive such as one of whom, that identifies an individual from among a larger group.

what is “ limiting appositive ”？

cicilla · 发表于 2005-1-19 15:51:00

哈哈，刚好看到有人解释同位语啦，他说得很清楚，给你看看：

同谓语和定语从句的区别：Adult survivors of child abuse traditionally have had little or no chance that they could get their symptoms recognized and treated.
(A) that they could get their symptoms recognized and treated
(B) to recognize and treat their symptoms
(C) of getting their symptoms recognized and treated
(D) of recognizing and treating symptoms（C）
(E) of getting his or her symptoms recognized and treated
A.that在这里起到同位语修饰的作用，但是chance,opportunity,way一般是不可以带that同位语修饰的。
1.同位语定语从句的区别是同位语的that只是连接词，在从句中部当任何成分。所以A的that从句是同位语。
2.同位语对同位语修饰的名词，就语义关系来说，相当于主语补语(或表语)或宾语所起的作用。常以that分句做同位语的名词有fact,risk,wish,announcement,realization,answer,belief,conclusion,decision,discovery,doubt,evidence,explanation,hope,idea, information,knowledge,law,news,opinion,possibility,probability,problem,principle,promise,report,rumour,statement,thought,understanding,truth等等。
如：做主语补语：The had to face the fact that the nearest filling station is thirty kilometers away.我们可以说 The fact is that the nearest filling station is thirty kilometers away.
再如：做宾语：There was a recommendation that she be promoted.我们可以说 They recommended that sh be promoted.
而这一题A中，我们不能说The chance is that they could get their symptoms recognized and treated.

OG 194

OG 194

所属分类: 下线版块

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()