ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (PAQI)

00:00:00

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2804|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG-5

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-12-6 23:11:00 | 只看该作者

OG-5

5.


Carbon-14 dating reveals that the megalithic monuments in Brittany are nearly 2,000 years as old as any of their supposed Mediterranean predecessors.


(A) as old as any of their supposed


(B) older than any of their supposed


(C) as old as their supposed


(D) older than any of their supposedly


(E) as old as their supposedly



I checked all the old discussion posts, and still have one question about the correct answer B,


Should it be "older than any other of their supposed"?



thank you



沙发
发表于 2004-12-6 23:18:00 | 只看该作者
我也不明白A错在哪里,请教
板凳
发表于 2004-12-7 10:07:00 | 只看该作者

Carbon-14 dating reveals that the megalithic monuments in Brittany are nearly 2,000 years as old as any of their supposed Mediterranean predecessors.


A错在用数字(2000 years )+ as old as 的表达方法上,而且将全句翻译过来,2000 years as old as 表示了两个东西年代一样有2000年久远,但是这明显跟predecessors的意思矛盾。


地板
发表于 2005-2-1 08:50:00 | 只看该作者

这个帖子很久了,不知道能不能再回答。


B: Should it be "older than any other of their supposed"?


因为文章比较的是megalithic monuments 与它的predecessors ,megalithic monuments 是不包括在它的predecessors之内的。两个属于不同的年代,所以可以用any of their supposed ...


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-2-1 8:52:46编辑过]
5#
发表于 2005-2-1 21:34:00 | 只看该作者

多谢vikkigmat,我明白了

6#
发表于 2005-2-1 22:17:00 | 只看该作者

偶觉得不是这样耶, Vikki SJM


因为原句写出2000 yrs , 所以应该要用比较级才有意义,


而不是跟predecessor有关.

7#
发表于 2005-2-2 09:27:00 | 只看该作者
不对的,KoloveTu, 如果说A和B一样都是2000yrs old,就不能用比较级,这里predecessor(老的,前辈,先驱) 暗示要用比较级。
8#
发表于 2005-2-2 14:30:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得这里用不用比较级要根据句子的意思来判断,这里句子的意思显然是在说这个东东megalithic monuments 被证实早于它的predecessor

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 11:15
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部