谢谢ls的答复: 我认为这种省略的说法有些牵强;而且即使是省略,意思也不通:叫的次数起到了温度计的数字的作用。我持保留意见。显然,E的意思合乎逻辑,叫的次数随温度变化,这一点能起到温度计的作用。 另外,can和possibly的替换是个严重错误,能否请楼上举个例子啊?我印象中,好像有一题是can和possibly同时出现,然后,解释中说语义重复之类。并没有说两次替换是严重错误。我在Prep Note中找到一题是possibly和might替换,仅供参考: 149. Stock levels for domestic crude oil are far lower than in past years, leaving domestic oil prices vulnerable to any hints of oil supplies being disrupted in the Middle East or to any unexpected consumer demand growth possibly prompted by colder-than-normal temperatures. A. leaving domestic oil prices vulnerable to any hints of oil supplies being disrupted in the Middle East or to any unexpected consumer demand growth possibly B. leaving domestic oil prices vulnerable to any hints of oil supply disruptions in the Middle East or any unexpected growth in consumer demand that might be C. leaving domestic oil prices vulnerable to any hints of oil supplies that are disrupted in the Middle East or to any unexpected growth in consumer demand as was possibly D. resulting in the fact that domestic oil prices are vulnerable to any hints of oil supplies being disrupted in the Middle East or to any unexpected consumer demand growth possibly E. resulting in the fact of domestic oil prices that are vulnerable to any hints of oil supply disruptions in the Middle East or to any unexpected growth in consumer demand that might be
A: being disrupted 的being 多余 B: correct C: hints of supplies 改变了原意,are disrupted 不如disruptions符合逻辑意思;as was 没必要用过去时,as应该改成that,定语从句 D: resulting in the fact 不如直接用leaving简洁 E: 同上;fact of … 错 |