ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1656|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

PREP-1-44

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2009-12-19 20:49:01 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
----------------------------------
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2009-12-21 14:07:02 | 只看该作者
顶顶
板凳
发表于 2009-12-21 16:05:39 | 只看该作者
说说我的拙见:

如果是of electricity and heat,这里的heat是做名词讲。若做名词讲是高温的意思,跟句子的“加热”的意思太远。
整体感觉E也有点晕晕的。
地板
发表于 2009-12-21 16:06:49 | 只看该作者
怎么没有人回答我的问题呢?哎....
it和they 的那个....
5#
发表于 2009-12-21 16:15:00 | 只看该作者
44.   Scientists at the Los Alamos National Laboratory have succeeded for the first time in mining heat from the Earth's interior and producing energy on a commercial scale, enough for efficient generation of electricity and heating factories and homes.
(A) and producing energy on a commercial scale, enough for efficient generation of electricity and heating
(B) and producing enough energy on a commercial scale for electricity to be generated efficiently and to heat
(C) for energy production on a commercial scale, enough for generating electricity efficiently and to heat
(D) to produce energy on a commercial scale, enough for generating electricity efficiently and for
(E) to produce enough energy on a commercial scale for efficient generation of electricity and heat

prep解释说heat和produce平行,为什么不能看作 efficient generation of (electricity and heat)
-- by 会员 ralachen (2009/12/19 20:49:01)



如果你看成是(electricity and heat),那后面的factories and homes宾语怎么办?除非你加 (for)in between
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2009-12-21 16:27:35 | 只看该作者
楼上正解
没认真往下看...多谢了
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-19 04:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部