ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2517|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]请教LSAT-1-4-4

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-1-12 21:59:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]请教LSAT-1-4-4

4.According to advertisements, the higher a suntan lotion’s sun protection factor, or SPF, the more protection from sunburn. In order for a suntan lotion to work, however, one has to remember to put it on before going in the sun, put on an adequate amount to cover the skin, and reapply it as needed. Therefore, it really does not matter what SPF a suntan lotion has.
Which one of the following best identifies the error in reasoning made in the passage?
(A) It is unreasonable to assume that the only purpose of a suntan lotion is to provide protection from sunburn.
(B) Because some people get sunburned more easily than others, the fact that there are different SPFs cannot be ignored.
(C) It cannot be concluded that the SPF is not important just because there are requirements for the application of the suntan lotion.
(D) It is unreasonable to assume that all suntan lotions require the same application.
(E) There is no reason to assume that manufacturers are unaware that people sometimes forget to apply suntan lotion before going in the sun.
    答案是C。我觉得理解上有点问题。
    我看答案后反推这里要表达的意思:似乎在说原文描述的内容其实本无因果关系,但是却得到了因果结论。
    但是我觉得原文要表达的意思是,suntan lotion 中的SPF越多,防晒能力越好,因此只要好好用suntan lotion,不论suntan lotion 中含有什么种类的SPF都无所谓(原文最后一句)。暗示SPF有多种,可能有的防晒能力强,有的防晒能力差。
    因此,我觉得作者意图在于强调SPF的种类(能力好和差)不如数量重要。反驳这个观点,我觉得和C选项中的requirements for the application of the suntan lotion.根本就无关。
    请NN指教

沙发
发表于 2004-1-12 23:25:00 | 只看该作者
you need to identify where the argument goes wrong. The reasoning of the passage:
Evidence: there are requirements for the application of the suntan lotion:   

Conclusion: it really does not matter what SPF a suntan lotion has. The same as to say that SPF is not important.

C is correct answer. It identifies a faulty reasoning the author made (…not important because of some requirements)
板凳
发表于 2004-1-12 23:35:00 | 只看该作者
FACTs
According to advertisements, the higher a suntan lotion’s sun protection factor, or SPF, the more protection from sunburn.
spf 越多----->protection 越多
PREMISE
In order for a suntan lotion to work, however, one has to remember to put it on
before going in the sun, put on an adequate amount to cover the skin, and reapply
it as needed.
CONCLUSION
Therefore, it really does not matter what SPF a suntan lotion has.
Reasoning Line 不通
要使生效就要出门前抹抹(reapply)Lotion---x--->一个Lotion有多少SPF无所
答案就是这么说的
It cannot be concluded that the SPF is not important just because there are requirements for the application of the suntan lotion.
答案是C。我觉得理解上有点问题。

我看答案后反推这里要表达的意思:
似乎在说原文描述的内容其实本无因果关系,但是却得到了因果结论。

同意.....


但是我觉得原文要表达的意思是,suntan lotion 中的SPF越多,防晒能力越好,因此只要好好用suntan lotion,不论suntan lotion 中含有什么种类的SPF都无所谓(原文最后一句)。暗示SPF有多种,可能有的防晒能力强,有的防晒能力差。
因此,我觉得作者意图在于强调SPF的种类(能力好和差)不如数量重要。反驳这个观点,我觉得和C选项中的requirements for the application of the suntan lotion.根本就无关。
   
想多了,把握reasoning line的主线,其他都当不知道

ps:偶不是NN


[此贴子已经被作者于2004-1-12 23:35:58编辑过]
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2004-1-12 23:51:00 | 只看该作者
万分感谢二位的回答,我理解了!!谢谢
5#
发表于 2005-1-25 18:15:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]请教LSAT-1-4-4

我觉得难点在B和C的选择上面。

C的表述是有问题的。题目最后明明说:“it really does not matter what SPF a suntan lotion has.”但是C的选项说的却是:“It cannot be concluded that the SPF is not important ”。使用哪种SPF不重要和是否使用SPF不重要根本就是两回事。

例如:Statement1:每天要锻炼身体,至于从事什么体育活动不重要。

Statement2:是否从事体育锻炼不重要。

Statement 1和statement 2是不能等同的,说的根本就不是一回事。

因此我认为C选项是有问题的。

反观题干,题干说使用哪种spf不重要,而B选项却针锋相对地提到,不同SPF之间的差别是不能忽视的。这点在意思上是到位了的。

但是B选项提出了新的information,并非如题目的要求,identify the error。C的句子机构却是符合题目要求。所以我对此感到非常为难。

至于其他的选项,基本排除,所以就不讨论了。

尚请高手点拨!

6#
发表于 2005-1-25 21:34:00 | 只看该作者
题目要求指出推理错误,所以正确选项说的必须是原文的内容。不能说原文没有的信息。B不但说的原文没有,而且原文的没差别的结论是基于用法上,B却提出新的理由。原文正是基于用途上的没差别得出含SPF的没差别,这种推理是错误的。B便指出这错误。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-10 06:08
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部