Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.
(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills（C）
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
解释说：
D and E introduce constructions that, in context, are faulty. First of all, both bans that x cannot be done and bans that y cannot do x are unidiomatic formulations. Secondly, the negative cannot after bans is illogical.
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.
(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills（C）
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
解释说：
D and E introduce constructions that, in context, are faulty. First of all, both bans that x cannot be done and bans that y cannot do x are unidiomatic formulations. Secondly, the negative cannot after bans is illogical.
我选了E，我的理解是，that引导抽象名词bans的同位语；可别处的讨论都不认可同位语的说法，不知道为什么？？？？并且当时考虑到了，ing分词作定语修饰的是普片性的，客观性的事物，此题选C就表示：bans天生就是用来 prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings 的，这样的话就不合理了。但上XDF的时候，老师讲过：法令、法规一般用ing修饰，这我就不清楚了，是对它们内容的修饰用ing还是对它们本身的修饰呢？？？？（有点纠结，说的不是很清楚）渴望牛牛们的清晰讲解，能列举些类似的题目最好！！！！
[此贴子已经被作者于2009/10/1 19:28:47编辑过] |
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2009-10-1 19:28:00
楼主
