ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1466|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]LSAT逻辑题,想不明白~

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-3-4 17:38:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]LSAT逻辑题,想不明白~

All of the best comedians have had unhappy childhoods. Yet, many people who have had happy childhoods are good comedians, and some good comedians who have had miserably unhappy childhoods are happy adults.
 
If the stataments in the passage are true, which one of the following CANNOT be true?
 
1. The proportion of good comedians who had unhappy childhoods is greater than the proportion of the best comedians who did.
 
2. Some good comedias have had unhappy childhoods and are unhappy adults.
 
3. Most of the best comedians are happy adults.
 
4. More good comedians have had unhappy childhoods than have had happy childhoods.
 
5. The proportion of comedians who are happy adults is higher than the proportion who are unhappy adults.
答案是第一个,为什么?绕不出来~
沙发
发表于 2009-3-4 19:24:00 | 只看该作者
如果题干内容正确,那么题支那个就必然错?选出错的一项。

题干里面说:comedians分为三类人,(1)best comedians with unhappy childhood(2)good comedians with unhappy childhood(3)good comedians with happy childhood

第一个答案为啥与题干冲突?因为从题干中,并未告诉第(2)与第(3)类
comedians的比例是多少(many和some并不是比例),而干题支作出了一个比例的判断,所以,是错误的,因此选1无疑义。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: 法学院申请

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-24 07:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部