ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1650|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助GWD22-11

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-11-18 16:28:00 | 只看该作者

求助GWD22-11

Q11:

There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.

 

  1. There are no legal limits, as there are for cod and haddock, on the size of monkfish that can be caught, a circumstance that contributes to their depletion through overfishing.

  2. There are no legal limits on the size of monkfish that can be caught, unlike cod or haddock, a circumstance that contributes to depleting them because they are being overfished.

  3. There are legal limits on the size of cod and haddock that can be caught, but not for monkfish, which contributes to its depletion through overfishing.

  4. Unlike cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, which contributes to its depletion by being overfished.

  5. Unlike catching cod and haddock, there are no legal size limits on catching monkfish, contributing to their depletion because they are overfished.

我选择E,正确答案C

不是说逗号后面的WITCH不可以指待前面整句句子吗?为什么C可以呢?谢谢!

沙发
发表于 2007-11-19 10:09:00 | 只看该作者

我的看法:which並非不能指前面整句,恰恰相反的,正因為他可以指前面整句,所以與就近修飾原則常會產生歧異,因為這原因所以,which開頭的選項多半為錯誤答案,但這不表示所有,which開頭選項都是錯誤選項。應該是it不能指整個句子才是。

板凳
发表于 2007-11-19 19:41:00 | 只看该作者

E也不对,unlike和there be不平行

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-3 00:23
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部