ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2686|回复: 8
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]OG12-23,一个弱弱的问题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2009-10-16 18:12:00 | 只看该作者

[求助]OG12-23,一个弱弱的问题

In a previous design, the weight of the discus used in track competition is concentrated in a metal center, but now it is
    
lined with lead around the perimeter, thereby improving stability in flight and resulting in longer throws.

A.In a previous design, the weight of the discus used in track competition is concentrated in a metal center, but now it is

B.According to a previous design, the weight of the discus used in track competition was concentrated in a metal center, but now it is

C.Once designed with its weight concentrated in a metal center, the discus used in track competition is now

D.This discus used in track competition, once designed with its weight concentrated in a metal center, but now

E.The discus used in track competition was once designed having its weight concentrated in a metal center and now

D选项的错误og解释是缺少main verb导致句子不完整。但是but后的line不是动词吗?but后面加句子缺少主语的话我还可以理解,求助大家~~

沙发
发表于 2009-10-16 18:43:00 | 只看该作者
This discus used in track competition, once designed with its weight concentrated in a metal center, but now
    
lined with
这里是被动,
    
所以没有谓语, 如果按你说的就变成主动, 不合理
板凳
发表于 2009-12-15 09:33:23 | 只看该作者
还有一个问题,就是E.The discus used in track competition was once designed having its weight concentrated in a metal center and now 中having it weight concentrated做定语的用法正确么?OG中给出的关于E的解释是now后面缺少一个is...
地板
发表于 2010-2-1 16:26:14 | 只看该作者
我觉得previous放在句首再接一个now很别扭。。有人这么觉得吗
5#
发表于 2010-2-1 16:32:24 | 只看该作者
furthermore, I also think "according to XXX" should be followed by the content of XXX, and to attach another clause began with "but" seems illogical..
6#
发表于 2010-2-1 20:38:22 | 只看该作者
今天也做了这道题。。。错了。。。。
7#
发表于 2010-5-8 13:34:03 | 只看该作者
根据OG的解释,这句话的逻辑表达是discus之前和之后设计的不同:正确选项C的解释designed 是动词的过去时,和once 相呼应;而后半句now 和is 相呼应。D中,缺少现在时表达之后设计,
lined可以作为动词,但是会语义模糊;还是SC推崇的简洁和准确
8#
发表于 2010-5-9 21:20:18 | 只看该作者
想问一下E里面的designed having its weight这个说法有错误吗
9#
发表于 2010-6-15 15:16:58 | 只看该作者
看到别的地方的大牛写的:having的用法是错的,

design something to do something
be designed for somebody/something
be designed as something
-- by 会员 蜕_舞 (2010/4/5 20:28:14)

接着问下used in track competition是修饰discus还是修饰the weight
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-4 00:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部