OG237修饰问题请教

237. It seems likely that a number of astronomical phenomena, such as the formation of planetary nebulas, may be caused by the interaction where two stars orbit each other at close range.

(A) may be caused by the interaction where two stars orbit each other

(B) may be caused by the interaction between two stars that each orbit the other

(C)  are because of the interaction between two stars that orbit each other

(D) are caused by the interaction of two stars where each is orbiting the other

(E) are caused by the interaction of two stars orbiting each other

C. Also, the phrase two stars that orbit each other illogically suggests that there are two particular stars causing all the phenomena in question, rather than various sets of stars in various loca­tions

请问在C和E中，如果前面都不一样，后面的定语从句和分词修饰是不是产生不同的意思，为什么会产生这种不同意思的差别？

不一样

这是限定性修饰与非限定性修饰的区别

C. Also, the phrase two stars that orbit each other illogically suggests that there are two particular stars causing all the phenomena in question, rather than various sets of stars in various loca­tions

OG的解释讲得非常清楚了

用定语从句 表示特指这两个星星

用分词 表示好多这样的星星  你再读读OG的解释

类似地例子

twins with the same genes 这是限定说明相同基因的twins

twins, who have the same genes这是说明 twins 有相同的基因 都是这样的

不知说明白了

paopao,你的意思是指  定語從句有限定 分詞沒有限定是嗎?

twins with the same genes 这是限定说明相同基因的twins

twins, who have the same genes这是说明 twins 有相同的基因 都是这样的

关于这题我也琢磨过,但和上面那题还是有差别的,因为WHO引导的是非限定性定愈从句而THAT引导的是限定性定语从句,不一样的啊?PAOPAO,你觉得呢?

我也有这个问题，因为即使是分词作定语，要起到非限定的作用，也必须是以逗号分开的，否则，分词修饰和从句修饰都是限定性的，请大家给个解释吧。

偶自己总结的现在分词和定语从句修饰上的区别：

从本题来看，偶觉得还有一个区别就是一个是泛指，一个是特指。（注意：泛指/特指和限定/非限定的区别）