ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

In a previous design, the weight of the discus used in track competition is concentrated in a metal center, but now it is lined with lead around the perimeter, thereby improving stability in flight and resulting in longer throws.

正确答案: C

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2519|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og12-23引发的关于【分词】在【并列句】句尾的问题,跪求指导

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-12-8 13:45:54 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
In a previous design, the weight of the discus used in track competition is concentrated in a metal center, but now it is lined with lead around the perimeter, thereby improving stability in flight and resulting in longer throws.

(A)In a previous design, the weight of the discus used in track competition is concentrated in a metal center, but now it is

(B)According to a previous design, the weight of the discus used in track competition was concentrated in a metal center, but now it is

(C)Once designed with its weight concentrated in a metal center, the discus used in track competition is now

(D)The discus used in track competition, once designed with its weight concentrated in a metal center, but now

(E)The discus used in track competition was once designed having its weight concentrated in a metal center and now

答案为C,OG的各项解释我也明白,我的问题是,假设有这样一个选项

(F) The discus used in track competition was once designed with its weight concentrated in a metal center, but now it is

我设置这个选项的【目的】是想说如果存在一个答案,【不存在】语法错误,但是它是一个【并列句】,所以请大家忽略此选项中可能有的语法错误

如果这样一个【无语法错误的并列句】成立,那么句末的【improving从句】,该如何看待它修饰的对象?
逻辑上它是修饰第二个分句,但是它会不会造成修饰不清楚的问题,比如它形式上可以修饰第二个分句么?可以修饰整个并列句么?又能不能跳跃修饰第一个分句?如果以上问题成立,那么这一点修饰混乱,又能不能成为判定【F】选项错误的TIP?

综合起来说,就是【SVO, and SVO,- ing从句】这种结构是否存在?   如果存在,【-ing从句】的成分优先考虑修饰哪个?其次是哪个?

跪求大牛指导,谢谢!
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2011-12-8 20:24:48 | 只看该作者
在线求~~~!!!
板凳
发表于 2011-12-8 20:48:07 | 只看该作者
既然是并列句,那就是两个完整的句子,分词状语在哪个句子里就修饰哪个。所以位置决定修饰
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2011-12-8 20:59:53 | 只看该作者
既然是并列句,那就是两个完整的句子,分词状语在哪个句子里就修饰哪个。所以位置决定修饰
-- by 会员 HarrisZheng (2011/12/8 20:48:07)


请问LS,您的意思我是不是可以理解为,【SVO, and SVO, ing从句】这种结构是存在的,并且它是修饰【and后面】的那个从句,并且不存在修饰整个句子这种歧义,是么?
5#
发表于 2011-12-8 21:21:24 | 只看该作者
我觉得可以存在,但一般还是改成复合句更好看吧。一堆简单句并列显得没水平,大量从句嵌套是GRE或是GMAT比较prefer的
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-12-8 21:29:41 | 只看该作者
我觉得可以存在,但一般还是改成复合句更好看吧。一堆简单句并列显得没水平,大量从句嵌套是GRE或是GMAT比较prefer的
-- by 会员 HarrisZheng (2011/12/8 21:21:24)



谢谢您的回答,从OG的解释来看,我一直觉得GMAT的首选是并列句呢, 我想再问下,如果(F)选项存在,也是成立的是么?有没有关于【SVO, and SVO, ing从句】这种结构存在的例子,我想再体会下,万分感谢您了!!!
7#
发表于 2011-12-8 21:57:54 | 只看该作者
首先, 你要搞清楚一个概念. 复合句比简单句并列简洁
几个不能算是原则的参照吧:
复合句比简单句堆叠简洁  如 I have a dog, and he likes to go out for a walk.  就不如I have a dog that likes to go out for a walk.

短语比从句简洁 如 My dog  likes to go out for a walk when he finishes dinner. 不如,分词结构 Finishing dinner, my dog  likes to go out for a walk. 或者 独立主格 Dinner finished,my dog  likes to go out for a walk


F 选项语法没错 但没有C选项好
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2011-12-8 22:06:51 | 只看该作者
谢谢哦,非常感谢您的回答!!!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-12 14:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部