求批！不用客气！

    Nowadays the conservation of endanger animals will be supported by most people all round the world. They believe that by destroying biodiversity we human being would bring the axe down on our heads. I admit that biodiversity is definitely beneficial both for human and natural, but I can hardly agree with the activities of paying lots of energy and money to prevent several kinds of animal from extinction for two sound reasons.

    First and foremost, extinction is a natural evolutionary process. Nobody can deny the fact that where there is a beginning there is an end. We are all live in a moving world; everything is changing in every second. It is very common for us to see old generation disappeared while new ones get onto the stage. For a simple example, just try to image a world without dinosaurs' extinction, how our human being's life would be? Also some ancient species of human being disappeared without ant mercy from any other creatures.

     In addition, people do not have the ability to change the natural process. Years ago Darwinian told us what natural selection, however, after hundreds of years most people remained unawareness of the principle of 'survival of fittest'. In other words, if animals can keep alive in this competing world, they do not need any help from human. Otherwise, suppose that we help endanger animals such as panda do to everything including feed, drink, even mate. In my opinion, these actions is fasting their extinction far from prevention. Whatever technology human being can invent, we can never be supernatural just because we are part of it.

       So taking all account all the factors discussed above, we may safely arrive at the conclusion that the so called conservation of endanger animal is unnecessary. Numerous facts have already told us any interference we did to natural; it will pay back by times.

有几个词性不对