ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 905|回复: 6
打印 上一主题 下一主题

gwd 12-22 请教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-9-28 07:23:00 | 只看该作者

gwd 12-22 请教

Q22:
On account of a law passed in 1993, making it a crime punishable by imprisonment that a United States citizen hold gold in the form of bullion or coins, immigrants found that on arrival in the United States they had to surrender all of the gold they had brought with them.

A   On account of a law passed in 1993, making it a crime punishable by imprisonment that a United States citizen hold
B   With a law passed in 1933 that makes it a crime punishable by imprisonment that a United States citizen hold
C   A law passed in 1933 that made it a crime punishable by imprisonment for a United States citizen holding
D   Because of a law passed in 1933 making it a crime punishable by imprisonment for a United States citizen to hold
E    Due to a law being passed in 1933 that makes it a crime punishable by imprisonment for a United States citizen to hold
答案是B,,请哪位给我解释一下,为什么其他的不对.

沙发
发表于 2007-9-28 10:32:00 | 只看该作者

B中的it指代that从句,cde中it没有指代对象

另外c的结构看起来象同位语,接immigrants逻辑错

e due to 和 being 错

a中的 making 修饰对象不清楚,可以修饰主句的主语immigrants,逻辑错

不知道思路对不对,请指教

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-9-29 00:39:00 | 只看该作者

还是有点迷糊

D,E错误是清楚了

CB,还是不清楚

C为什么逻辑错误,C前面是独立句子,后面也是句子

地板
发表于 2007-9-29 09:06:00 | 只看该作者

c that 从句修饰a law ,不是独立句子,passed 也是修饰a law 的,就等于 a law怎么怎么样,immigrants怎么怎么样。两个概念不是对等的。

btw, 如果前后都是独立句子,没有连词一样不对


[此贴子已经被作者于2007-9-29 9:21:14编辑过]
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-9-29 10:09:00 | 只看该作者

哦,明白了.原来都是修饰LAW的.

我可真笨,都是句子的话,之间必须要有连词,这个也没考虑到

6#
发表于 2007-9-29 11:23:00 | 只看该作者

The investigations of many psychologists and anthropologists support the generalization of there being little that is a significant difference in the underlying mental processes manifested by people from different cultures.
(A) of there being little that is a significant difference
(B) of there being little that is significantly different
(C) of little that is significantly different
(D) that there is little that is significantly different
(E) that there is little of significant differences

请问DE如何区分?

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-9-29 23:51:00 | 只看该作者

我看大牛解释的版本里是说 significantly different与significant differences有差异, 后者有2个意思,但是前者意思明确,就是指重大的差异.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 23:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部