ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1779|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

再问's cost 和 the cost to 的区别啊.CD之前没有解释

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-9-27 12:04:00 | 只看该作者

再问's cost 和 the cost to 的区别啊.CD之前没有解释

大全补充题43, 蓝皮书section17 第15题:

43. The United States petroleum industry’s cost to meet environmental regulations is projected at ten percent of the price per barrel of refined petroleum by the end of the decade.

(A) The United States petroleum industry’s cost to meet environmental regulations is projected at ten percent of the price per barrel of refined petroleum by the end of the decade.

(B) The United States petroleum industry’s cost by the end of the decade to meet environmental regulations is estimated at ten percent of the price per barrel of refined petroleum.

(C) By the end of the decade, the United States petroleum industry’s cost of meeting environmental regulations is projected at ten percent of the price per barrel of refined petroleum.

(D) To meet environmental regulations, the cost to the United States petroleum industry is estimated at ten percent of the price per barrel of refined petroleum by the end of the decade.E

(E) It is estimated that by the end of the decade the cost to the United States petroleum industry of meeting environmental regulations will be ten percent of the price per barrel of refined petroleum.

我的问题是:

从答案来看,仿佛要用The cost to the United States petroleum industry,不能用the cost to meet environmental regulations.那D为什么不好呢? E里面那个of meeting看着就是不舒服啊.

另外,为什么不能用Indutry's cost to meet.... 我想不通啊.有语法解释吗?

沙发
发表于 2008-9-27 13:06:00 | 只看该作者
C: By the end of the decade是修is projected, 邏輯意思不對
D:
by the end of the decade是修is estimated, 邏輯意思不對
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2008-9-28 13:47:00 | 只看该作者

醍壶灌顶了! 厉害,一语道破. 原来不是COST的问题. 

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-18 03:31
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部