1.The following appeared in a memorandum from the head of a human resources department at a major automobile manufacturing company to the company's managers: “Studies have found that employees of not-for-profit organizations and charities are often more highly motivated than employees of for-profit corporations to perform well at work when their performance is not being monitored or evaluated. Interviews with employees of not-for-profit organizations suggest that the reason for their greater motivation is the belief that their work helps to improve society. Because they believe in the importance of their work, they have personal reasons to perform well, even when no financial reward is present. Thus, if our corporation began donating a significant portion of its profits to humanitarian causes, our employees’ motivation and productivity would increase substantially and our overall profits would increase as well.” Discuss how well reasoned . . .etc. 1、结论是错的。on the one hand, 公司经营的主要目的赢利,如果其所取得的利润还不够公司的日常开支,又何谈慈善事业;on the other hand,结论本身与前面所说的非赢利组织的员工的工作态度相背离。 2、就算这种做法能改变员工的工作态度,提高业绩水平,公司的利润分配是不是问题?公司员工的bonus, salary会不会因此减少?如果因为慈善事业改变员工的福利,那就适得其反。 3、员工的工作态度事实上与公司捐助多少profit给慈善事业没有必然的关系。更大程度上取决于员工自身的价值观、公司的企业文化及老板的领导态度等。 (4、这个研究是否有权威性?谁做的研究,在那做的研究,具体针对哪些公司做了研究?具体的数据是多少) 此题涉及“七宗罪”的4罪即:“可疑调查”、“错误类比”、“结论无据" 注:小弟刚刚开始GMAT的复习,潜水于AWA版块近半个月,看了黄金80题AA的前十几道题,看出了一点心得。不知道自己的学习心得是否正确所以拿这道新题出来,写了自己的思路去weak arguement,不知道自己的方向是否正确,请各位牛人指教。谢谢 还有个建议,希望发AA的板油写好自己的idea时附上与该题相关的”几罪“,因为在板子上看到许多板油询问 七总罪 到底怎么用,可能他们还没有了解 七 所说的具体含义,如果以case说明效果会好些。仅仅是个建议。供斑竹参考 ![](/static/legacy-emoticon/Dvbbs/em01.gif) ![](/static/legacy-emoticon/Dvbbs/em01.gif)
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-7-8 9:58:11编辑过] |