ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1358|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 11 P689 62题,感觉OG有错

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2008-10-7 00:05:00 | 只看该作者

OG 11 P689 62题,感觉OG有错

62. A 1972 agreement between Canada and the United States reduced the amount of phosphates that
   municipalities had been allowed to dump into the Great Lakes.

A. reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities had been allowed to dump

B. reduced the phosphate amount that municipalities had been dumping
   

C. reduces the phosphate amount municipalities have been allowed to dump

D. reduced the amount of phosphates that municipalities are allowed to dump

E. reduces the amount of phosphates allowed for dumping by municipalities

答案:D

我的困惑是A。我感觉A才是对的

OG的解释是:Since the dumping continues into the present, the past perfect verb "had benn allowed" should instead be the present "are allowed"

我认为:

1、既然是continues into the present,那更应该用一个完成时态才对。

2、时态修饰的应该是allow,而不是dump。时态应该根据allow来调整才对啊。

3、agreement降低的排放量应该是agreement达成以前所允许的,而不是”现在"允许的排放量。如果选D,那就是 agreement在过去降低了现在允许的排放量,逻辑错误啊。

期待牛人解答

答案:D

我的困惑是A。我感觉A才是对的

OG的解释是:Since the dumping continues into the present, the past perfect verb "had benn allowed" should instead be the present "are allowed"

我认为:

1、既然是continues into the present,那更应该用一个完成时态才对。

2、时态修饰的应该是allow,而不是dump。时态应该根据allow来调整才对啊。

3、agreement降低的排放量应该是agreement达成以前所允许的,而不是”现在"允许的排放量。如果选D,那就是 agreement在过去降低了现在允许的排放量,逻辑错误啊。

期待牛人解答


[此贴子已经被作者于2008-10-7 0:05:48编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2008-10-7 02:04:00 | 只看该作者
用过去完成时表示发生在agreement出现之前,既然发生在agreement出现之前,又怎么可能被agreement reduce呢?所以A错.这个reduce讲的是对现在的影响.
板凳
发表于 2008-10-7 03:08:00 | 只看该作者

这个我也很困惑,按照BY的解释,答案是A。

地板
 楼主| 发表于 2008-10-7 12:27:00 | 只看该作者

依然困惑

顶一下

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2008-10-7 17:26:00 | 只看该作者

再顶

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-3 05:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部