小作文是关于计算机是否会思考,大作文是问是否赞同像对待家庭成员那样对待宠物。内容是我在barron模考软件里打好然后拷贝出来的,还没有改里面的一些拼写和语法错误,放word里看了下,错误似乎很少。希望有高手帮我看看我作文里的语法,用词及结构,内容先假设是符合考试要求的吧。顺便帮我评估下大小作文合起来大概能打多少分,谢谢了。 PS :连续写了好几篇大作文,似乎总脱离不了那种总——分的框架 大作文 In my opinion, I disagree with the statement that pets should be treated like family members. To tell the truth, pets are really not only very cute and docile, but also it seems that it can understand the emotion of the family members. However, I think the disadvantages of treating them as family member are more than their advantages. In the first place, the pets is prune to be affected by the bacteria or the parasites, which often results in that the family member who contacts with it very closely is ill. Although its owner looks after it very carefully and comfortably, its characters determine this result. For instance, once I met some acquaintances in the community clinic and talked with them, I found that all of them were ill due to they played with their pets too intimately. What's more, the relevant reports are often raised in the newspaper. The other disadvantage is that sometimes it will injure people and take a lot of troubles. It often become very domestic, however, it is impossible to predict when it could be enraged to bite people. After all, the owner can not communite with it really, and he/she can only train it to be smart apparently. Furthermore, no one knows whether it has the ability to control its behavior or not. When I was twelve, I bred a cat as a pet. When I was processing the fish in the kitchen, it suddenly rushed and bitted me on my finger. As a result, my finger was blooded which costs me several hundred Yuan to heal. After that I was very carefully to play with it to avoid being hurt again. There are still other disadvantages, such as contaminating the indoor environment due to disposing its rubbish arbitrarily, biting the furniture, clothes, or other things. Therefore, I strongly insist on my opinion.
小作文 The lecture casts doubt on the idea in the reading passage. The reading passage introduces a famous experiment which is called Turing experiment. According to the test result, it is concluded that the computer can not think. In the passage, the experiment is designed to be that one person in a room chats with a stranger which is maybe a person or a computer in another room and judge the response from it. If he/she can not distinguish the difference or can not decide whether it is a person or a computer, then the result is that computer wins. Till now, there raised many contests that are similar to such case, but no computer can pass the Turing test. In the lecture, the philosopher refutes this conclusion and he deems that the Turing experiment can not certificate that whether computer can think or not. His conception is that if two person, such as an English speaker and a Chinese man, communicate by using a reference system, for example, a computer that can process very complex input and generate very comprehensive output, then these two person can have an intercourse without handicap. That is to say, it is very the computer to help translate their meanings and result in the smooth. From the test result it appears the computer seems to have intelligence. However, the computer really hasn't it. That it can generate a response which is very like the behavior of human being should be ascribed to that the computer is programed very strongly and considerably. |