ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1191|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

没提过的简单问题OG10TH Q243

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-4-17 22:05:00 | 只看该作者

没提过的简单问题OG10TH Q243

没提过的简单问题.

OG10TH,Q243

243. Some scientists have been critical of the laboratory tests conducted by the Federal Drug Administration on the grounds that the amounts of suspected carcinogens fed to animals far exceeds those that humans could consume.

(A)  far exceeds those that humans could consume

(B)  exceeds by far those humans can consume

(C)  far exceeds those humans are able to consume

(D)  exceed by far those able to be consumed
                by humans

(E)  far exceed those that humans could consume

Choice E is best. The plural verb exceed agrees in number with its subject, amounts, 但是我好象在哪看到过:AMOUNT是修饰不可数名词的,更何况是THE AMOUNT 所以我首先就排除E,选A了.NN请关于这点解释下.谢谢

沙发
发表于 2007-4-17 22:56:00 | 只看该作者
这条规则在GMAT中不适用,还有 amounts of phosphates
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2007-4-18 08:36:00 | 只看该作者

这样吗?可是 我看好多书上也那样写的呀?

斑斑

地板
发表于 2007-4-18 09:56:00 | 只看该作者

gmat中不考绝对的单复数,名字如果没有s,则单数;有s,则复数;另一种情况,遇到固定搭配,比如 a number of ,则考固定搭配的特殊用法,a number of是跟后面的名字的单复;

这里,the amount of 如果不是固定搭配,从amount的单复,用复;如果the amount of算固定搭配,从of后的单复,也用复。。。

所以这题中the amount of是不是固定搭配没影响

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-4-18 09:56:00 | 只看该作者
想了想,问了同学,知道了,谢谢2楼
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-1-27 07:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部