ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 844|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

11thOG 第4题 求教~~

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-9-13 23:57:00 | 只看该作者

11thOG 第4题 求教~~

4.         A survey by the National Council of Churches showed that in 1986 there were 20,736 female ministers, almost 9 percent of the nation's clergy, twice as much
                            as 1977.

 

    
                        

A:  wice as much as 1977

B:twice as many as1977    

C:double what it was in 1977  

D:double the figure for 1977

E : a number double that of 1977's

Diction

 

 

Some quantities, such as people, can be counted; other quantities, such as respect, cannot. It can be said that a person earned much respect, or that many people attended an event. Here, much is incorrectly applied to ministers. As 1977 incorrectly completes the comparison; it would have to be as many as in 1977, which is not one of the possible answers. Another way to make the comparison emphasizes the number, 20,736; a number can be doubled. Double the figure for 1977 places the focus on the number and correctly completes the comparison.

A Much incorrectly refers to ministers; as should be as in

B As 1977 does not correctly complete this
comparison; it should be
as in 1977

C What it was is awkward, wordy, and unclear

D Correct. Double the figure places the emphasis

of the sentence on the number of ministers; for

1977 correctly completes the comparison.

E Wordy and awkward construction

The correct answer is D.

请问大家 D 中的 double the figure for1977 是否符合表达习惯? for 1977能否替换in 1977?

沙发
发表于 2007-9-14 00:16:00 | 只看该作者

来来来,大家给点分析意见嘛!!上班没感看,只能在半夜等着大家的回复了.....等啊等啊等.......

板凳
发表于 2007-9-14 02:24:00 | 只看该作者

in 1977成了时间状语了.这里需要的是定语. 意思是:"1977年的数字",而不是"在1977年翻倍了这个数字"

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-25 00:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部