以下是引用wangshu0306在2008-2-21 17:25:00的发言:是costs所占propotion的大小的比较,因为proportion在主句里面是动作的宾语,而than引导的从句里面用it was的话,句子结构就不对称了。所以也应该和主句结构一样,用costs做从句的主语,而不是proportion。因为句子结构不对称,所以即使用了it,it也不一定就可以代表proportion,还可以代表spending,或者presidential compaign,这样指代模糊,是肯定错误的。 gmat不支持根据词语的含义来推测代词的指代,这个在OG里面有很多例子了。至于你说的B省略太多不能构成比较,我倒是找到一个跟B差不多的例子: 大全509题 1. More ancient Egyptian temples were constructed in the reign of Ramses II as in any other. (A) as in any other (B) as any other (C) as in others (D) than others (E) than in any other 答案E 这一题也把in any other之前的所有成分都省略了,但是没有影响理解,因为省略掉的成分在前面都出现过,并且和主句的结构是一致的。所以我觉得B是可以的。个人认为,than引导的比较,按照平行原则,从句结构必须和主句结构一致,在结构一致的前提下,可以省略完全一样的成分,保留不一样的成分,突出比较的对象;有时候可以省略而不省略的话,甚至还会被认为是redundancy。这一点在不少的大全和OG题目上已经得到了验证。
黄底字是我不同意的地方,理由请看OG10-132或OG11紫-92: According to a study by the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, companies in the United States are providing job training and general education for nearly eight million people, about equivalent to the enrollment of the nation's four-year colleges and universities. (A) equivalent to the enrollment of (B) the equivalent of those enrolled in (C) equal to those who are enrolled in (D) as many as the enrollment of (E) as many as are enrolled in 此题中的比较对象people,同样是主句中动作的宾语,而且在比较结构中作了主语,如果按照wangshu0306所言,E选项应该直接排除,但是答案却是E。所以wangshu0306说的“因为proportion在主句里面是动作的宾语,而than引导的从句里面用it was的话,句子结构就不对称了”不能作为判断的依据,据此认为代词指代不好,也就无从说起。另外,我认为B项的错误在于,省略造成比较对象不清楚,如果说明比较对象是清楚的,自然这个判断就不对了,所以关键还是如何判断比较的对象。 wangshu0306,能否再看看,欢迎大家都来讨论,留下想法  |