ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1300|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

Columbia EBS 7: Matching Dell

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-5-5 04:37:00 | 只看该作者

Columbia EBS 7: Matching Dell

ESB

            

Case: Matching Dell, 1999


            


    
- How does Dell’s approach in the personal computer industry
differ from its main competitors?


            


    
- What accounts for the difference in performance between Dell and
its major competitors?


            


    
- How far is Dell’s position likely to be sustainable in the
future?


            

Background: Revenue of Dell rose from $3.5 bn in 1994 to $18.2
bn in 1998 while profits $149 mn to $1.5 bn. Stock price up by
5600%.


            

Dell Advantage: Economies of Scale – huge fixed cost of
distribution (500Mn /$20bn = 2.5%): direct sales force (100 Mn)
which focused on medium-large institution clients and web-base
services (50K pages). Dominated this sector. In 1994, margin of
Dell Direct was 5% while -3% of Dell retail.


            

Gateway had better mfg cost. If it follows Dell and gets 20% MKT
of Dell: 20% * 20bn = 4bn, distribution cost/sales = 500mn/4bn =
12.5%!


            

Inventory of save: Compaq 8% - Dell 2% = 6% * Interest Rate of
Cash (3%) = 0.18%


            

Operation Efficiency: direct sales, outsource on-site services,
rapid customized response, lean mfg process (36 hours), efficient
assembly, and close supplier relationship.


            

Dell’s map: Strategic Situation (Efficiency/cost-advantage in
Dist. vs Inefficiency in Mfg) + Op Efficiency à Strategic Decision
à Performance.


            

Compaq: Huge improvement on Op. Eff (200K à 600K) à Success à
Loss of Focus, Acquisition à HP takeover.


            

Reseller: Integration; Specialize; Fully support services; want
machine quality, price, generic machine. à So IBM/HP/Compaq work
better for resellers.


            

Performance Manipulation:


            

$20Bn Sales, OI $1.6bn, 8%


            

Reduce working Cap $6bn à $2bn by $4bn


            

Cost: 6% * 4bn = $240 Mn


            

Assuming off-set by higher supplier price elsewhere (Delay
Payment – reduce working Cap)


            

OI: $1.6 bn - $240Mn = $1.36 bn


            

Pre-Change ROIC = 1.6 bn/6bn = 26.7%


            

Post-Change ROIC = 1.36 bn/2bn = 63% without fundamental value
created!


        

    
沙发
发表于 2007-5-5 04:48:00 | 只看该作者

Hi - this is a very good analysis but kind of outdated. Now Dell is in trouble, overachieved by HP.

Dell is probably still the No.1 in cost control and lean manufacturing, but what Dell lack is culture built and customer relationship building. Now Dell is trying very hard to catch up in customer relationship.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

NTU MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-11-5 08:41
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部