[求助]TWE 041练习 谢谢赐教~~ ^_^

是让人们用land呢,还是给濒危动物呢?~

Some people assert that lands should use for human needs instead of saving for endangered animals. While I want to reason that human should rationally save lands and protect habitats for endangered animal. The reasons for animals’ endangered are complicated and varied; besides illegal killing, destroy and lost of the habitats do will indirectly cause animals’ endangered, because habitat has a great significance to the animals.

Forests and grasslands are important habitats. However, many other human activities such as deforest could bring about wildlife’s endanger. Take building railways for example; have occupied inherent homes of wildlife. What is worse, the overall wildlife population has been mandatory separated into many small and isolated populations, which strikes a fatal impact on the species proliferation.

Equally important are shoals and mudflats. Especially for two-sacrifice reptiles, mudflat occupied is the root of endanger. For example, Chinese Alligators, which wild species have been living even over billion years in the earth, are facing extinction with the habitats’ lost. Even scientists have stated that the factor, which limits rescue the wild species, is not the lack of advanced techniques, but habitats.

Nevertheless, people also should rationally realize that the genetic failure, the inner reason of animals’ endangered, plays an irreplaceable role. During long-term evolutionary process, some species have been forming sets of special habits, which however make them difficult to adapt the changed or strange environments. In fact, Giant Panda is a typical instance. The special habit of fed-on young bamboo only will make Giant Panda definitely eliminated in evolution. Therefore, human have no need to waste precious yet indispensable resources like lands on these species. Instead, lands should meet human needs for farmland, housing, and industry.