第一次写综合作文困难重重.请帮忙!

还是用了LM CD ROM的MINITEST题.我知道上面题出的不好，不过第一次练为了感受一下真实界面所以还是用了上面的题.全都是对READING部分肯定的,这种题确实不太好,因为基本上TOEFL考如何反驳READING的观点的。

出现的问题:1 写的时候时间有点不太够.我差个尾巴没写完.思考如何联系听力和阅读之间关系用了很多时间,怕表达的不正确.

 2 这个听力材料不太复杂所以还可以应付，我经常听的时候记不下来要点导致要写的时候可写的东西很少,这有什么办法呢?

3 在CD上看的模板内容的局限性很大,而且有点过长和罗嗦,所以简单用了几个词而已,是不是不一定非要用模板,结构合适就可以了?

下面是我写的,因为20分钟内没写完,所以是之后补充好的版本.望有时间的朋友帮我看看有什么大问题.谢谢!

(内容是讲历史的定义.听力举了个事例来支持文章观点.我觉得这种自己要从例子中寻找如何支持了文章观点的题目相对更困难些,需要自己动脑)

In this lecture, the professor made an example to support that history is a selection of events based on the interpretation of the historian which is stated in the reading passage.

The example the professor uses to support the reading is that two biography books of a famous presenter tells definitely different but true things. The first biography focus on the presenter's early life which his father's business problem influent his family situation, several minute things in his school life such as he broke the discipline, failed to enter the team, etc. In comparison, the second book selected a lot of happy periods of the presenter's life. For instance, he had a happy home life with his parents and elementary school life when he was young, he achieved great academic honor in his college life...All of this support that history is a selection the historian made. Different selections of the events in a period can tell totally different things which just like this two biographies give us quite different ideas of the grow-up story of the presenter.

Furthermore, the professor uses this example to bolster that the events on based on the interpretation of the historian. The first biography interpreted the man’s life negatively by selecting negative events while the second one interpreted the man’s life affirmatively by selecting affirmative events.

In conclusion, the example made in the lecture supports that history is not a record of everything but a selection of events which are based on the interpretation of the historian.

感觉范文都会把点分段说的啊， 难道这篇就一两点吗?不是都三点的吗