ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1647|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

刚写的OG上关于无私的作文,请版主帮忙看看

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-1-26 06:59:00 | 只看该作者

刚写的OG上关于无私的作文,请版主帮忙看看

我觉得要克服使用笔记上那些原词好困难,所以写的时候不顺手,有时候自己实在说不出新鲜词,只好照用,会扣分吗?还有字数也只能达到200出头,怕不够。请版主赐教。

The lecturer talks about the benefits of meerkats and humans through some activities to demonstrate that there is no altruism in such behaviors. In this way, the main idea of the passage is refuted by the lecturer.

In the first place, the lecturer mentions a study about meerkats which reveals that this animal does not take on the responsibility of guarding without eating. On the contrary, it eats in advance. This fact is in conflict with the passage which says that the meerkat on guard has nothing to eat while it has to help others. What's more, the lecturer also offers the information that just because of the chance to be a guard, meerkat could run quickly into the burrow near it and take advantages of the other meerkats which are running all directions. Obviously those poor creatures will draw attention of the enemy and protect the guard. This is described as a high risk mission in the reading while it's not the truth.

In addition, donators are not so great in the lecture considering their gain, I mean, the respect of society. It is those donators who receive the pride and fame as feedback of their behavior. This also contradicts the information from the passage that donators receive nothing.

沙发
发表于 2007-1-26 23:33:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用emilycliff在2007-1-26 6:59:00的发言:

我觉得要克服使用笔记上那些原词好困难,所以写的时候不顺手,有时候自己实在说不出新鲜词,只好照用,会扣分吗?还有字数也只能达到200出头,怕不够。请版主赐教。

The lecturer talks about the benefits of meerkats and humans(不要s) through some activities to demonstrate that there is no altruism in such behaviors. In this way, the main idea of the passage is refuted by the lecturer.

In the first place, the lecturer mentions a study about meerkats which reveals that this animal does not take on the responsibility of guarding without eating(否定太多了,句子很awkward). On the contrary, it eats in advance. This fact is in conflict with the passage which says that the meerkat on guard has nothing to eat while it has to help others(从句套从句,还跟在with后面,结构不好,句意不清晰). What's more, the lecturer also offers the information that just because of the chance to be a guard, meerkat could run quickly into the burrow near it and take the advantages of the other meerkats which are running all directions. Obviously those poor creatures will draw attention of the enemy and protect the guard. This is described as a high risk mission in the reading while it's not the truth.

In addition, donators are not so great in the lecture considering their gain, I mean, the respect of society. It is those donators who receive the pride and fame as feedback of their behaviorS. This also contradicts the information from the passage that donators receive nothing(歧义,从句修饰啥的?).

板凳
发表于 2007-1-26 23:40:00 | 只看该作者
综合写作主要是要做到表述清楚,到位就行了。楼主似乎长句太多,最好长短结合。
地板
发表于 2007-1-27 01:50:00 | 只看该作者
楼主看OG上那个满分的啊,,,,每个论点都分段,,,在段尾加一句废话...比如:这直接是和原文冲突的,,,,这是和文章不符合的第二个地方...等等....基本就够250字了  而且分开段老师容易找到你的中心句,,,好给分
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

所属分类: TOEFL / IELTS

近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-6-28 15:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部