ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1688|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

'while' - is it ambiguous to indicate a contrast?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2017-8-30 04:14:15 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
OG 131:

While is somewhat ambiguous, since it might indicate simultaneity rather than contrast; the referent of it is ambiguous, raising questions about just what two things are being compared.

OG 134:

the phrase while raising provides a clear contrast with have reduced.

Over  75 percent of the energy produced in France derives from nuclear power, while in Germany it is just over 33 percent.
   
    (A) while in Germany it is just over 33 percent
    (B) compared to Germany, which uses just over 33 percent
    (C) whereas nuclear power accounts for just over 33 percent of the energy  produced in Germany
    (D) whereas just over 33 percent of the energy comes from nuclear power in  Germany
    (E) compared with the energy from nuclear power in Germany, where it is  just over 33 percent
   
   
Rhetorical  construction;   Logical  predication
    This sentence compares percentages and uses the  prepositional phrases in France and in Germany to distinguish the percentage  of energy in each country coming from nuclear power.  This information is most efficiently and clearly presented in two clauses  joined by the conjunction whereas, which signifies a difference between the  situations in the two countries. Each clause must identify what the  percentage refers to—that is, the portion of the respective country's energy  that comes from nuclear power.
   
    A    While is somewhat ambiguous, since it might indicate  simultaneity rather than contrast; the referent of it is ambiguous, raising  questions about just what two things are being compared.
    B    This sentence compares 75  percent to Germany; it is not clear what 33 percent refers to.
    C    Correct. The two clauses joined  by whereas indicate clearly that the comparison is  between the different percentages of energy coming from nuclear power.
    D    The use of the definite article  the makes it seem as though the energy being referred to in this part of the  sentence is that of France.
    E    This construction is wordy and unclear; the referent of  it is ambiguous.
   



Recently  implemented "shift-work equations" based on studies of the human sleep cycle have reduced sickness,  sleeping on the job, fatigue among shift workers,  and have raised   production efficiency in various industries.
   
    (A) fatigue among shift workers, and have raised
    (B) fatigue among shift workers, and raised
    (C) and fatigue among shift workers while raising
    (D) lowered fatigue among shift workers, and raised
    (E) and fatigue among shift workers was lowered while raising
   
Grammatical  construction
    Implementing the equations has reduced sickness, sleeping on the job, and  fatigue; at the same time, it has increased efficiency. The three parallel  elements (have reduced x, y, and z) require and before the final element.
   
    A    The omission of and before  fatigue creates an unclear sentence.
    B     The omission of and before  fatigue creates an unclear sentence.
    C    Correct. The use of and in this  sentence unites the three parallel elements; the phrase while raising provides a clear contrast with have reduced.
    D    And is required to link the  parallel elements; the verb reduced applies to all  three parallel elements, so inserting lowered  before fatigue illogically suggests that fatigue actually increased.
    E    The insertion of was lowered destroys the parallel structure, and thus while raising has no logical referent here.
   

收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2017-8-31 06:17:26 | 只看该作者
过来人诚心建议 语法部分OG的解释就不要看了,直接去看RON
板凳
发表于 2019-8-26 10:43:41 | 只看该作者
while在作比较时还强调同时性
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-9 10:20
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部