ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3054|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

补充题 132

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-12-9 11:01:00 | 只看该作者

补充题 132

132.    The attorney turned down the law firm’s offer of a position because she suspected that it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting.
(A) quota with no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
(B) quota, having no commitment to minority hiring and eventually promoting
(C) quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
(D) quota, not reflecting a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion
(E) quota, not one that reflected that minority hiring and eventual promotion was a commitment

选 C .
请那位大侠给讲讲,还有 it was meant merely to fill an affirmative action quota 是啥意思?
沙发
发表于 2003-12-9 11:11:00 | 只看该作者
这题得看懂句意,这里的no commitment to m hiring...指的是offer没这么着,不是action这么着。“这个offer仅仅是应付着充数。"(看到这个merely to fill就理解了这意思,具体不用细究)
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-12-9 11:16:00 | 只看该作者
get it !
Thank Marrow
地板
发表于 2005-5-4 02:18:00 | 只看该作者
谁能给具体翻译一下啊,好疑惑……
5#
发表于 2006-6-18 22:41:00 | 只看该作者
这道题我上当了 我还以为是fill sth. with sth...看到 fill with 结构所以不觉得错 但是我也想了想 逻辑上的意思用fill with翻译也能通啊 望大牛指点一下
6#
发表于 2009-8-19 18:10:00 | 只看该作者

(C) quota and did not reflect a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotion

(D) quota, not reflecting a commitment to minority hiring and eventual promotionC

有没有NN解释下C D 的区别?我选了d,因为我觉得not reflecting a commitment to ....是对之前的解释,谢谢!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 15:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部