我对OG100的看法,请指教

OG 100
Wisconsin, Illinois, Florida, and Minnesota have
begun to enforce statewide bans prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings.
(A) prohibiting landfills to accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(B) prohibiting that landfills accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(C) prohibiting landfills from accepting leaves, brush, and grass clippings
(D) that leaves, brush, and grass clippings cannot be accepted in landfills
(E) that landfills cannot accept leaves, brush, and grass clippings

看了以前的讨论,似乎说的最多的就是bans that后不能用否定的问题, 我反而觉得这没啥疑问, 因为OG说的很明白:the negative cannot after bans is illogical. 对于这种英语习惯和规则,死记就是了. 但是OG关于both bans that x cannot be done and bans that y cannot do x are unidiomatic formulations的解释是否表明bans后面不能使用同位语从句, 如果是这样,我想请教哪些类似的情况也不能用同位语,谢谢.

我認為og說的illogical並不是指雙重否定的問題～D,E選項的cannot 並不構成雙重否定！og的意思應該是說bans用cannot是不能配的～因為cannot的語氣不夠強烈～要用must not!!

“the negative cannot after bans is illogical”

这里刻意地强调了negative，感觉不是改成must not这么简单啊