ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6284|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD-21-10

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-12-11 23:28:00 | 只看该作者

GWD-21-10

求解:谢谢大家


GWD 21-10


Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.


A.     it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who


B.     it appears had been an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and stunning evidence that human ancestors


C.     appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground and is stunning evidence that human ancestors


D.     appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors  (D)


E.      appears that it is an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence of human ancestors who


沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2005-12-12 14:12:00 | 只看该作者
该题D项,偶看不清结构,请高手指点.
板凳
发表于 2005-12-12 14:33:00 | 只看该作者

1.it指代不清,排除ABE


2.C中,appears was ...and is...问题大了,一般appear的用法是appear to be 而且C中一句句子中出现两个动词,又是appear又是was。

地板
发表于 2005-12-23 11:45:00 | 只看该作者

同意。 appear to be..

5#
发表于 2006-6-28 03:42:00 | 只看该作者

这个题目的成分我也不太清楚, 我也选了D, 完全是按照appear to be, 还有后半部分看的比较舒服才选的.

谁能告诉我句子的成分呢?

from what?是什么?

appears为什么是单数?,它不是指spears吗?

6#
发表于 2006-6-28 03:44:00 | 只看该作者

哦哦哦!

明白了,原来是倒装了啊

an ancient lakeshore hunting ground       appears to be       from what(=400,000-year-old wooden spears )

7#
发表于 2006-9-13 15:27:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用llfllfllf在2006-6-28 3:42:00的发言:

这个题目的成分我也不太清楚, 我也选了D, 完全是按照appear to be, 还有后半部分看的比较舒服才选的.

谁能告诉我句子的成分呢?

from what?是什么?

appears为什么是单数?,它不是指spears吗?

我想from what应该是一个介词短语,what相当于the place that 。。。。而且后面给出了地点是an ancient lakeshore hunting ground 所以这里appear要用的单数,后面的  stunning evidence that human ancestors应该是一个同位语,所以应该是完整的句子。
8#
发表于 2007-5-26 11:14:00 | 只看该作者

应该不是倒装。

研究者在德国发掘出了400,000历史的长矛从(一个看起来像是古代湖边的狩猎场的地方,狩猎场是一个很极好的证据来证明人类的祖先比之前以为更早的系统的进行狩猎。

from是“从”的意思。what apears to be...所以appear用单数。stunning evidence是单数,很好的避免了可能出现的歧义,做同位语。

9#
发表于 2008-4-20 14:51:00 | 只看该作者
stunning evidence 不可能是hunting ground的同位语,因为这不是句子强调的重心,而spear才是这个惊人的发现,而不是打猎场

我认为stunning evidence应该是spear的同位语,所以问题就是,难道同位语可以离得这么远?
还是说evidence指代 整个前面的句子?同位语有这么用的么?
大家接着讨论一下。
10#
发表于 2008-4-20 15:12:00 | 只看该作者

Researchers in Germany have unearthed 400,000-year-old wooden spears from what it appears was an ancient lakeshore hunting ground as stunning evidence of human ancestors who systematically hunted big game much earlier than believed.

D. appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors

说点愚见吧,what appears to be an ancient lakeshore hunting ground, stunning evidence that human ancestors

from what 中what后面所接的是一个名词性从句,所以用的是陈述句语序,what在名词性从句中充当的是主语的成分

eg.What worries me is how we're going to pay for all this. what引导的名词性从句做主语

stunning evidence that human ancestors 这部分是一个伴随壮语,伴随状语的主语和主句主语的相同,即researchers,

句子的意思应当是

研究者在德国发掘出了~~~~,从而证明了~~~~,伴随状语表结果

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-23 01:29
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部