ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3321|回复: 7
打印 上一主题 下一主题

885-S08-26 求教

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2003-10-29 17:48:00 | 只看该作者

885-S08-26 求教

26. Never before had taxpayers confronted so many changes at once as they had in the Tax Refrom Act of 1986.
(A) so many changes at once as they had in
(D) as many changes at once as they confronted in

the answer is D.  If choice A is changed as " so many changes at once as they did in", the expression is correct?  Many thanks.
沙发
发表于 2003-10-29 18:42:00 | 只看该作者
so as 只用于否定句,出现no/not才算否定句的,有never的是肯定句。D中Confronted变成did也是对的吧。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2003-10-29 18:46:00 | 只看该作者
got it, good luck to u!
地板
发表于 2005-2-21 10:39:00 | 只看该作者

26. Never before had taxpayers confronted so many changes at once as they had in the Tax Refrom Act of 1986.
(A) so many changes at once as they had in
(D) as many changes at once as they confronted in

请问 so much...as 用在否定句中, never 表否定的意思, 为什么在这个句里不可以?

5#
发表于 2005-2-21 17:26:00 | 只看该作者

同意樓上,never錶否定,應該可以用so much ... as

頂一下

6#
发表于 2005-7-8 18:35:00 | 只看该作者
ding, what is your opinion at end? confused.
7#
发表于 2005-8-9 13:57:00 | 只看该作者

我觉得选择D是因为其他选项都不合理,当然,我认为否定句还是应该用So...as,而never显然是否定啊


open to discuss

8#
发表于 2006-9-29 23:17:00 | 只看该作者
必须是明确的否定词才行,这个词组的用法是这样的: not so...as..
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-5 18:38
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部