ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1807|回复: 10
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教一道gwd语法,哪位帮忙看看啊,谢谢了!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-9-16 23:31:00 | 只看该作者

请教一道gwd语法,哪位帮忙看看啊,谢谢了!!

Q16:???

Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also caused erosion and very quickly deforested whole regions.

 

  1. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
  2. Not only did the systematic clearing of forests in the United States create farmland (especially in the Northeast), which gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
  3. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States, creating farmland (especially in the Northeast) and giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but also
  4. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States created farmland (especially in the Northeast) and gave consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it also
  5. The systematic clearing of forests in the United States not only created farmland (especially in the Northeast), giving consumers relatively inexpensive houses and furniture, but it

   Answer:

此题似乎没有正确答案:Ebut it also, B Which的使用我认为不妥:如果which 修饰farmland则逻辑含义不通,但which引导的全聚又不能修饰前面的整个句子

沙发
发表于 2006-9-17 08:23:00 | 只看该作者
是B啦
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2006-9-17 12:18:00 | 只看该作者

谢谢回复!那选B 是因为which 引导的从句跨越修饰前面的systematic clearing of forests 而不是修饰farmland吗?

地板
发表于 2006-9-17 12:30:00 | 只看该作者

"D" seems a better answer to me. 这里的意思不是递进,而是转折。

5#
发表于 2006-9-17 22:03:00 | 只看该作者

我记得有一条规律是,如果原文为倒装,把倒装语序任意改成了顺序结果,必然错,所以这道题目c d e 我一上来就会直接排除,

not only 放句首,为了强调 

请高人确认!

6#
发表于 2006-9-20 23:03:00 | 只看该作者
not only, but also
7#
发表于 2006-9-20 23:40:00 | 只看该作者

it not only...., it but also.....

'it' is surplus.

8#
发表于 2006-9-21 00:31:00 | 只看该作者

我没怎么注意句意。not only but also的结构让我直接选了B。

不过也有和楼主相同的意见

D中but also表达了一个递进的关系。如果不加not only 的话,句意是不完整的。


[此贴子已经被作者于2006-9-21 0:32:47编辑过]
9#
发表于 2006-9-21 00:34:00 | 只看该作者

对了lz改下标题吧:GWD 8-20

方便后人搜索噢

10#
发表于 2006-9-21 01:16:00 | 只看该作者

我支持E。

1。but前有逗号,后面的分句没有it不妥

2。如lz所说,前面一件事情造成了后面的结果,giving,用结果状语从句好。

最后,not only,but我觉得没有问题,至少我在collins词典中找到了例句,

...,not merely to sweep the floor, but even to move about the room.

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-5 12:49
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部