ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 940|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

大全792

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2006-8-13 18:11:00 | 只看该作者

大全792

792.
            The odds are about 4 to 1 against surviving a takeover offer, and many business consultants therefore advise that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse to take calls from likely corporate raiders.

(A) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding offers like these be to even refuse

(B) that a company’s first line of defense in eluding such offers be to refuse even

(C) a company defending itself against offers of this kind that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuse

(D) companies which are defending themselves against such an offer that, as a first line of defense, they should even refuseB

(E) that the first line of defense for a company who is eluding offers like these is the refusal even

Choice A is awkward and poorly phrased: these has no plural noun to which it can refer, and even should be placed immediately before to take calls, the phrase it modifies. Choice B is best. In C, the plural they does not agree with the singular company,
                even is misplaced, and advise…that…they should is unidiomatic. D has the plural companies but retains the other flaws of C. In E, who in place of that is an inappropriate pronoun for company, these does not agree with the singular offer, and is the refusal should be be to refuse. This question is difficult.

关于OG中A和E的解释,如果他认为E中的these和原文的a takeover offer不匹配,那么A中的错误应该也是一样咯,为什么说A的these没有可以refer呢?

沙发
发表于 2006-8-16 12:45:00 | 只看该作者
A and E have the same problem of no referent.
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-20 19:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部