[求助]再问GWD12-19 即新prep1-255

以前的讨论里大家都认为选C。但新的prep里答案给的E。

我个人觉得C不好,especially if it has worked well in the past离修饰对象太远...E避免了这个。但E这个答案真的肯定吗？prep破解的答案不会错的吧？？？

255.     (29858-!-item-!-188;#058&004408)     (GWD-12-Q19)

Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

A. Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

B. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that worked well in the past, makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear.

C. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear, especially if it has worked well in the past.

D. Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear.

E. Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.

 嗯~同意~句子最主要表达的是heavily committed to a course of action会让executive怎样怎样~

especially那个解释的很好，C项就是这个让我觉得特别特别不对

ezailshi解释得很好,从插入语的角度看E确实比C好,但是我总觉得"E中miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear"没有C中"miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble"简洁

难道作者这样重复有什么特殊目的吗?

C最多就it 离指代的对象远了一点,而E中的缺点似乎才是GMAT的常考点

遇到这种情况到底该怎样权衡呢?疑惑中......

感觉C中的it不是指的远了而是有歧义可以指trouble也可以指action，如果指trouble不就意思不对啦吗

刚开始看E的时候因为有bing也犹豫了，但这个being后来感觉没有错，不是多余的.再加上感觉C指代不清，

最后选的E