以下是引用maotian在2004-6-8 22:22:00的发言:35. In June of 1987, The Bridge of Trinquetaille, Vincent van Gogh’s view of an iron bridge over the Rhone sold for $20.2 million and it was the second highest price ever paid for a painting at auction.
(A) Rhone sold for $20.2 million and it was
(B) Rhone, which sold for $20.2 million, was
(C) Rhone, was sold for $20.2 million,
(D) Rhone was sold for $20.2 million, being(C)
(E) Rhone, sold for $20.2 million, and was
A comma is needed after Rhone in choices A and D to set off the modifying phrase that begins Vincent...; without the comma, the phrase appears to be part of the main clause, and it is thus unclear what noun should govern the verb sold. 答案没有问题。 问题是og的这部分解释究竟什么意思?我觉得“n1,n2 +vo"是很常见的一种句型啊。
首先,我想请你能否找到一个合理的n1,n2 + v用法的句子作个例证,谢谢!
其次,针对这题
主语是:The Bridge of Trinquetaille,
同位补充解释:Vincent van Gogh’s view of an iron bridge over the Rhone
句子的谓语:sold for $20.2 million
如果没有逗号,谓语岂不成了同位补充解释的谓语,而不是整个句子的谓语了。所以,在此处,逗号是必须的。
再举个例子:
Reagan, the pre-President of the US, died. 如果US后没有逗号,那么无法表达是里根死了,而是指美国的前总统死了,到底是哪个前总统?不知道。另外,Reagan在句中是何成分也不清楚。
[此贴子已经被作者于2004-6-9 1:55:19编辑过] |