看了ron的课，做题的时候还是遇到疑惑的地方
心酸，刚敲了半个小时的题目没有了
1、是否需要主被动一致？
og13 54
The report recommended that the hospital should eliminate unneeded beds, expensive services should be consolidated, and use space in other hospitals. A、should eliminate unneeded beds, expensive services should be consolidated, and use space in other hospitals B、should eliminate unneeded beds, expensive services should be consolidated, and other hospitals' space be used C、should eliminate unneeded beds, expensive services should be consolidated, and to use space in other hospitals D、eliminate unneeded beds, consolidate expensive services, and other hospitals' space used E、eliminate unneeded beds, consolidate expensive services, and use space in other hospitals
答案是E，
但是主被动一定要一致吗，在平行结构中？
暂时没找到不一致的情况好像
2、是否需要时态一致？
因为我记得ron说verb tense要100%看context不看grammer
然后og里面既有时态一致的例子也有时态不一致的例子（关键是时态一致的例子的og解释中说这样才是平行的？）
一致的例子，og13 137
Joachim Raff and Giacomo Meyerbeer are examples of the kind of composer who receives popular acclaim while living, often goes into decline after death, and never regains popularity again. A、often goes into decline after death, and never regains popularity again B、whose reputation declines after death and never regains its status again C、but whose reputation declines after death and never regains its former status D、who declines in reputation after death and who never regained popularity again E、then has declined in reputation after death and never regained popularity 答案是C， og解释： Faulty parallelism in the relative clause who receives ... goes ... regains ... makes it unclear who or what is being described. The original clause begins by describing a certain kind of composer. As written, with who as the subject of goes and regains, the last two descriptions illogically continue to refer to the kind of composer. Logically it must be the reputation that declines after the composer's death.
A Illogically suggests the composer goes into decline after death; redundant again
B The two clauses are not parallel, lack a coordinating conjunction, and do not describe the same thing; redundant again
C Correct. This sentence presents the proper logic while maintaining parallel structure and consistent verb tense.
D The verb tenses are inconsistent with present tense used in the first phrase; redundant again
E The verb tenses are inconsistent with present tense used in the first phrase; to maintain parallelism, the verbs must be receives ... declines ... regains （为啥！！）
C这个句子中平行的是whose reputation declines after death 和 never regains its former status，这是啥结构？prep phrase？还是noun+verb?
parallelism中的平行结构如果长一点我就有点晕，怎么区分他平行的是noun+verb还是啥？？？
不一致的例子，og13 128
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving as a kind of snorkel A、that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolving B、that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving C、suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally evolved D、to suggest that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolved E、to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved 答案是E，og说that引导的句子平行且时态正确
that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal 和 that its trunk originally evolved 中平行的部分是什么从句？还是noun+verb？（完了我都不知道平行的是啥结构TAT）
另，
is descended 是一般式的被动形式对吗？因为是general truth所以用一般式？
而 evolved是过去式？
求回答，，，敲了两遍好心塞
| 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2015-8-11 15:56:43
收藏
收藏
楼主
