ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 3967|回复: 14
打印 上一主题 下一主题

GWD一道有关分词修饰的问题 求解答

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2014-9-14 11:15:17 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Almost a decade after New York State passed laws to protect patients by reducing the grueling hours worked by medical residents, twelve hospitals have been investigated by state medical officials, finding that all twelve consistently break the laws, many residents work longer than 24 hours straight, and that more than half the surgical residents work more than 95 hours a week.
A. twelve hospitals have been investigated by state medical officials, finding that all twelve consistently break the laws, many residents work longer than 24 hours straight, and that more than half the surgical residents work
B. an investigation by state medical officials of twelve hospitals have found all twelve consistently breaking the laws, that many residents work longer than 24 hours straight, with more than half the surgical residents working
C. an investigation of twelve hospitals by state medical officials has found that all twelve consistently break the laws, that many residents work longer than 24 hours straight, and that more than half the surgical residents work
D. twelve hospitals were investigated by state medical officials who found all twelve breaking the laws, with many residents working longer than 24 hours straight, and more than half the surgical residents work
A. an investigation by state medical officials has found that, of twelve hospitals, all twelve consistently break the laws, that many residents work longer than 24 hours straight, with more than half the surgical residents working

1.C选项是正确的但是我觉得 that...and that...and that 是不是有问题
2.关于A的分词修饰问题。解释里的说明是hospital不能作为find 的逻辑主语所以错误。
当我做题的时候,我是这么想的。 考虑finding 作伴随动作,hospital 不能作find 的逻辑主语,因此有误——》考虑作伴随结果,显然finding 不能作直接结果,因此有误——》finding 作officials 的定语,逻辑上没有问题但是与原意不同,因而有误。 按照如上办法我排除了A  
想问问这样的方法是不是正确,还是直接因为hospital 不能作find 的逻辑主语就排除了A 选项??
求NN解答下
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2014-9-14 11:24:42 | 只看该作者
关于A的分析我觉得是对的
A 分词问题-->hospitals 是被find而不是主动去find得(是officers 发现他们违规)所以这里分词是错了的
同时A选项的另外一个问题是,run-on sentence 几句完整的句子没有连接词

C选项 几个that并列做find得宾语-没有问题【所有的正确选项都不会有问题】
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2014-9-14 11:44:35 | 只看该作者
言熙樾 发表于 2014-9-14 11:24
关于A的分析我觉得是对的
A 分词问题-->hospitals 是被find而不是主动去find得(是officers 发现他们违规) ...

1.我注意到你分析A的时候只说了find作伴随动作的情况,hospital 不能作逻辑主语所以排除了,因此做分词是排除了的。是不是通过这个点足以排除A?还是应该继续考虑下去,若是作伴随结果或定语之中的一个成立就判定这个点是正确的(当然若是同时满足就判定为歧义)。。。{对于分词修饰我的问题貌似有点多,还是再麻烦你一下了}
A的连接词问题我是清楚的,就是分词修饰那个点我老是有问题。
2.我知道几个that并列没有问题,但是他是 that ... and that ...and that ...不是应该and 在最后一个that 之前出现吗?
地板
发表于 2014-9-14 12:22:32 | 只看该作者
sunyuwei 发表于 2014-9-14 11:44
1.我注意到你分析A的时候只说了find作伴随动作的情况,hospital 不能作逻辑主语所以排除了,因此做分词是 ...

理论上来说-步骤是正确的,说白了语法奏是排除题,一个点一个点的排除
多分析一下:除了伴随以外
这里find不是做定语(这个和我之前回复过的一个题是一样的,会改变重心)因为定语只是对于名词的一个修饰和限定
结果状语在那个温度计里面解释了~^ ^

正确选项里面,是that..that..and that [估计是看错了]

5#
 楼主| 发表于 2014-9-14 12:50:28 | 只看该作者
言熙樾 发表于 2014-9-14 12:22
理论上来说-步骤是正确的,说白了语法奏是排除题,一个点一个点的排除
多分析一下:除了伴随以外
这里fin ...

1.你说的一个点一个点排除指的是作伴随动作,伴随结果,定语这三个点吧。任意一个点符合逻辑就判定正确,没有一个点符合逻辑就排除选项,若是其中有两个点都符合逻辑那便是歧义了 我这样理解对吧
2.作伴随动作主要看逻辑主语,作伴随结果看的是逻辑含义,至于作定语多半会改变句子含义,对吧?至于我说的那道OG找到了会贴上来给你看的 我们来分析一下
3.额...正确选项确实是看错了。
6#
发表于 2014-9-14 13:01:53 | 只看该作者
sunyuwei 发表于 2014-9-14 12:50
1.你说的一个点一个点排除指的是作伴随动作,伴随结果,定语这三个点吧。任意一个点符合逻辑就判定正确, ...

是的~~
唯一补充的一点是,定语的合理性往往和句意有比较紧密的关系~根据句子重心来判断~~
7#
 楼主| 发表于 2014-9-14 13:13:00 | 只看该作者
言熙樾 发表于 2014-9-14 13:01
是的~~
唯一补充的一点是,定语的合理性往往和句意有比较紧密的关系~根据句子重心来判断~~ ...

妈妈再也不用担心我分词修饰问题了
8#
 楼主| 发表于 2014-9-14 13:24:14 | 只看该作者
言熙樾 发表于 2014-9-14 13:01
是的~~
唯一补充的一点是,定语的合理性往往和句意有比较紧密的关系~根据句子重心来判断~~ ...

Scientist, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are now drawing solid conclusions about how the human brain grows and how babies acquire language.

(A) Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood, are
(B) Neuroscientists, having amassed a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are
(C) Neuroscientists amassing a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood over the past twenty years, and are
(D) Neuroscientists have amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,
(E) Neuroscientists have amassed, over the past twenty years, a wealth of knowledge about the brain and its development from birth to adulthood,
这就是那道OG里唯一分词作定语的题目
9#
发表于 2014-9-14 13:58:23 | 只看该作者
sunyuwei 发表于 2014-9-14 13:24
Scientist, having amassed a wealth of knowledge over the past twenty years about the brain and its ...

Having  done 的总结这个就最清楚了~【来自CD的OG的全解,忘了是哪里下的了】
A) having done和having been done都不是动名词结构,因此不能充当名词成分!                  
   所以SC中,如果这两个结构做主语、宾语等,必错!
B) having done和having been done做后置定语(限定型),必错!
having done做后置定语,一般都要改成相应的定语从句
having been done做后置定语,一般都要改成相应的done做过去分词,或者改成定语从句
C) having done和having been done用于“with独立主格”中必错!
指with+ sb./sth+ having done/having been done这种情况
D)having done可以做非限定性修饰,不能做限定性修饰。                        
E) having done短语中所表达的内容发生在主句动作之前                          
F) When/after +having done 结构一定错
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2014-9-14 14:03:10 | 只看该作者
言熙樾 发表于 2014-9-14 13:58
Having  done 的总结这个就最清楚了~【来自CD的OG的全解,忘了是哪里下的了】
A) having done和having b ...

这个总结很赞!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-15 04:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部