ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1242|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

og191 觉得这段解释自相矛盾

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-9-15 21:09:00 | 只看该作者

og191 觉得这段解释自相矛盾

191. Lawmakers are examining measures that would require banks to disclose all fees and account requirements in writing, provide free cashing of government checks, and to create basic savings accounts to carry minimal fees and require minimal initial deposits.



(A)             provide free cashing of government checks, and to create basic savings accounts to carry



(B)             provide free cashing of government checks, and creating basic savings accounts carrying



(C)             to provide free cashing of government checks, and creating basic savings accounts that carry



(D)             to provide free cashing of government checks, creating basic savings accounts to carry



(E)              to provide free cashing of government checks, and to create basic savings accounts that carry









Choice E, the best answer, is the only choice that maintains parallelism with the infinitive phrases to disclose..., [to] provide..., and to create.... In A and B, the second element lacks the infinitive marker to. Choice C loses parallelism by shifting to a participial phrase, creating....Choice D loses parallelism by dropping the conjunction and; a modification problem results because the participial phrase creating... attaches to the noun checks, thus distorting the meaning of the last element of the parallel construction.


既然黄色句子里provide前的to打了括号,说明可以省略。那兰色的那句话和黄色的不就矛盾了嘛??

沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2005-9-16 09:49:00 | 只看该作者
自顶
板凳
发表于 2005-9-16 16:40:00 | 只看该作者
我也没明白to加个括号是什么意思,但在这里to是不能被省略的。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-13 08:22
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部