ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1078|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求助,OG里的SC题目。

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2017-8-20 11:24:17 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
Defense attorneys have occasionally argued that their clients’ misconduct stemmed from a reaction to something ingested, but in attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy, the perpetrators are in effect told that they are not responsible for their actions.
  • Ain attributing criminal or delinquent behavior to some food allergy
  • Bif criminal or delinquent behavior is attributed to an allergy to some food
  • Cin attributing behavior that is criminal or delinquent to an allergy to some food
  • Dif some food allergy is attributed as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
  • Ein attributing a food allergy as the cause of criminal or delinquent behavior
          很多答案解析说   如果选ACE, in attributing 的逻辑主语是后面的 the perpetrators ,就是错误。为什么呢?perpetrators不能自己把罪因   归因为食物过敏吗?



收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2017-8-22 15:44:16 | 只看该作者
介词短语在句首起状语作用,逻辑主语等于句子主语,即perpetrator

修饰成分in attributing修饰的对象应该是defense attorneys,但是ACE中的用法使得修饰成分错误地修饰了perpetrateors。
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2017-8-28 09:36:04 | 只看该作者
Fiona09 发表于 2017-8-22 15:44
介词短语在句首起状语作用,逻辑主语等于句子主语,即perpetrator

修饰成分in attributing修饰的对象应该 ...

懂了,谢谢~
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 20:47
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部