ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1421|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

关于比较平行问题中主谓的省略问题求解~

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2017-4-10 09:12:31 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
楼主在prep08里看到两题感觉是一个情况,但是解题的答案不一样,求各位牛牛解答!
Soaring television costs accounted for more than half the spending in the presidential campaign of 1992, a greater proportion than it was in any previous election.
A. a greater proportion than it was
B. a greater proportion than
C. a greater proportion than they have been
D. which is greater than was so
E. which is greater than it has been


To develop more accurate population forecasts, demographers have to know a great deal more than now about the social and economic determinants of fertility.
A. have to know a great deal more than now about the social and economic
B. have to know a great deal more than they do now about the social and economical
C. would have to know a great deal more than they do now about the social and economical
D. would have to know a great deal more than they do now about the social and economic
E. would have to know a great deal more than now about the social and economic


第一题答案是B,第二题答案是D,对此给出的第二题解释是说:now作为状语没有与其平行的副词,所以than后面需要有成分能够与a great deal平行,一个好的解决方法是than后面补出主谓,使than前后形成句子的平行。所以楼主在做第一题的时候也用同样的思路考虑错选了A,但是第一题B选项的解释是这个句子中只是单个名词(proportion)的比较,所以不需要考虑than后面补出主谓,只补出介词短语就够了,不用担心后面的介词短语in any previou election没有平行对象
好懵逼啊。。。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2017-4-10 14:16:17 | 只看该作者
可以試著從是否比較相同或相似這邊下手
第一題的第一個 1992年的propotion明顯和後面的propotion(先前)的不一樣, 所以不能用it
第二題中 可能要知道現在知道還多, 不能用要知道現在比, 比較對象不對
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2017-4-10 14:26:30 | 只看该作者
sheanen 发表于 2017-4-10 14:16
可以試著從是否比較相同或相似這邊下手
第一題的第一個 1992年的propotion明顯和後面的propotion(先前)的不 ...

谢谢回复!
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-5-21 13:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部