ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 1798|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG 16-055 求大神解释outnumbering指代不清的问题

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-7-31 09:40:10 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
4Emily Dickinson’s letters to Susan Huntington Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering her letters to anyone else.
A. Dickinson were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumbering

B. Dickinson were written over a period that begins a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ended shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber

C. Dickinson, written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and that ends shortly before Emily’s death in 1886 and outnumbering

D. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother, ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, and outnumbering
E. Dickinson, which were written over a period beginning a few years before Susan’s marriage to Emily’s brother and ending shortly before Emily’s death in 1886, outnumber
正解为E

想求问A选项:OG里解释为outnumbering指代不清,但是 letters to XXX were XXX,outnumbering letters to XXX 这不是一个挺清晰的结构吗?还是因为伴随状语离subject太远?


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2016-7-31 09:41:05 | 只看该作者
自己顶一下
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2016-7-31 10:14:46 | 只看该作者
找到了答案,贴上来:RON对此问题的回答
this is exactly the problem: the phrase in question, "outnumbering ...", is NOT, in any way whatsoever, a "(direct/indirect) result" of the time period over which the letters were written. these are tw completely independent and unrelated observations about the letters, and so they can't be placed into the sort of construction that appears in choice (a). this is thus not a grammatical problem so much as a problem of clarity, but it's still a problem.

examples:
my brother, who ate bagel bites for breakfast every single day of his high school career, graduated in 1994. --> correct; his eating bagel bites had no impact on his graduation date.
my brother ate bagel bites for breakfast every single day of his high school career, graduating in 1994. --> incorrect; these are two unrelated observations, but this construction erroneously implies some sort of relationship.
简单点说就是:因为两个句子是相互独立的,不存在相互关系,因为不存在伴随结果等的问题,应该要单独分开。
地板
发表于 2016-7-31 11:04:26 | 只看该作者
lawrence_yeung 发表于 2016-7-31 10:14
找到了答案,贴上来:RON对此问题的回答
this is exactly the problem: the phrase in question, "outnumbe ...

LZ在哪里找到答案的呀?Google吗?求指导
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2016-7-31 11:36:00 | 只看该作者
vi.len 发表于 2016-7-31 11:04
LZ在哪里找到答案的呀?Google吗?求指导

直接百度找的
6#
发表于 2016-10-28 16:14:48 | 只看该作者
但是which那儿跟着Dickson, 不是说这样不太好么
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-2-23 06:37
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部