ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 6949|回复: 5
打印 上一主题 下一主题

问下比较级 more 能不能和 rather than 配 啊?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2011-4-17 17:03:04 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
有点拿不准~问问~
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2011-4-18 10:21:51 | 只看该作者
举例吧……这么问的话,直觉上是不行。。。
板凳
发表于 2011-5-2 19:32:01 | 只看该作者
Manhattan SC里明确指明这种用法是错误的:
More ... rather than
More ... instead of
More ... as
比较级 + over
都是错误的用法
地板
发表于 2011-8-23 22:47:11 | 只看该作者
谢谢楼上!!!!
5#
发表于 2014-7-29 11:09:09 | 只看该作者
balgirl 发表于 2011-5-2 19:32
Manhattan SC里明确指明这种用法是错误的:More ... rather thanMore ... instead ofMore ... as比较级 + o ...

语法笔记里写明了more...rather than 的用法错误;然而,在07prep 2 的31题

Gone are the sharp edges and jutting planes ofstyles from former eras; instead, designers of everything from cars to computermonitors have adopted a cornerless style of smooth surfaces and curves that is moreergonomic, conforming to the shape of the body rather than flaunting shapefor its own sake.


(A) more ergonomic, conforming to the shape of thebody rather than flaunting shape


(B) more ergonomic, conformed to the body's shapeand not to flaunting shape

(C) ergonomic, more conformed to the shape of thebody and not to shape flaunted

(D) ergonomic, conforming more to the body's shaperather than shape flaunted

(E) ergonomic, conforming more to the shape of thebody than flaunting shape

这题的答案是A,也就是承认了more ... rather than 的用法。
这是怎么回事呢
6#
发表于 2016-9-1 22:15:18 | 只看该作者
我也没搞懂 这里的more没有比较对象 如果rather than是和conforming那句搭配的话
不应该有more就有than么?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-14 12:36
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部