- UID
- 1205695
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2016-4-21
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
好像有不少关于此题的讨论
Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.
A. Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.
B. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that worked well in the past, makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear.
C. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear, especially if it has worked well in the past.
D. Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear.
E. Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.
选E 我对A有疑惑
搜索了Ron对A选项的解释 ：
* makes it likely to miss...
this doesn't work.
technically, this would mean that "it" - an unspecified entity - is likely to miss the signs.
if you use the "it is ADJ..." construction, and the verb has a specific subject, you MUST include that subject in the construction. it is likely that the executive will miss...
以上大意应该就是it指代不清吧 但是it的用法里不是可以用作形式主语或形式宾语？为什么一定要把subject写上？那如果这种句子：it's easy to solve this problem 由于缺少subject也是不对的咯？
求解求解！ |
|
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2016-8-11 19:29:54
收藏
收藏
楼主
