ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (DCHC)

00:00:00

Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that employers should retain all older workers indefinitely or show just cause for dismissal.

正确答案: E

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1594|回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

require that和 require to

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-8-18 11:04:00 | 只看该作者

require that和 require to

for instance:


OG 138. Senator Lasker has proposed legislation requiring that employers should retain all older workers indefinitely
or show just cause for dismissal.
(A) that employers should retain all older workers
(B) that all older workers be retained by employers
(C) the retaining by employers of all older workers
(D) employers' retention of all older workers
(E) employers to retain all older workers


if the word"should" of the answer (A):"that employers should retain all older workers" was ejected  , whether (A) would be the best answer in that (E) has changed the logical meaning of the original sentence?


The idiom "require that" invovies  the subjunctive mood  but does not "require to".


IS "require to " prior to "require that'?


help THX in advance.


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-8-18 11:10:49编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2005-8-18 11:10:00 | 只看该作者
A的should去掉的话A和E都是正确答案,分不出孰优孰劣。。。个人意见
板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-8-18 11:13:00 | 只看该作者

THX


I have got another question.


^.^


Does "require to" invovle the subjunctive mood  ?


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-8-18 11:13:15编辑过]
地板
发表于 2005-8-18 11:19:00 | 只看该作者
不用。
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-8-18 11:23:00 | 只看该作者

THX^.^


如果 require to没有包含虚拟语气 ,而且 又有去掉 should的A的答案, 那 A是不是符合没有改变句子逻辑含义的规则呢? 如果选 E 则 改变了句子含义了。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-24 10:32
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部